summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>2009-11-13 13:13:01 +0000
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2009-11-15 22:21:34 -0800
commit2d6682db114cb53bc94991659478756302e6a600 (patch)
tree7854ccf1c9b0098fa84c444c07d88a360d662aa8
parentb93ab837a2d3eb394082c9eae4ee0a4f83060027 (diff)
bonding: fix 802.3ad standards compliance error
The language of 802.3ad 43.4.9 requires the "recordPDU" function to, in part, compare the Partner parameter values in a received LACPDU to the stored Actor values. If those match, then the Partner's synchronization state is set to true. The current 802.3ad implementation is performing these steps out of order; first, the synchronization check is done, then the paramters are checked to see if they match (the synch check being done against a match check of a prior LACPDU). This causes delays in establishing aggregators in some circumstances. This patch modifies the 802.3ad code to call __choose_matched, the function that does the "match" comparisions, as the first step of __record_pdu, instead of immediately afterwards. This new behavior is in compliance with the language of the standard. Some additional commentary relating to code vs. standard is also added. Reported by Martin Patterson <martin@gear6.com> who also supplied the logic of the fix and verified the patch. Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c85
1 files changed, 43 insertions, 42 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
index 1d058192328..88c3fe80b35 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
@@ -446,6 +446,48 @@ static u16 __ad_timer_to_ticks(u16 timer_type, u16 par)
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/**
+ * __choose_matched - update a port's matched variable from a received lacpdu
+ * @lacpdu: the lacpdu we've received
+ * @port: the port we're looking at
+ *
+ * Update the value of the matched variable, using parameter values from a
+ * newly received lacpdu. Parameter values for the partner carried in the
+ * received PDU are compared with the corresponding operational parameter
+ * values for the actor. Matched is set to TRUE if all of these parameters
+ * match and the PDU parameter partner_state.aggregation has the same value as
+ * actor_oper_port_state.aggregation and lacp will actively maintain the link
+ * in the aggregation. Matched is also set to TRUE if the value of
+ * actor_state.aggregation in the received PDU is set to FALSE, i.e., indicates
+ * an individual link and lacp will actively maintain the link. Otherwise,
+ * matched is set to FALSE. LACP is considered to be actively maintaining the
+ * link if either the PDU's actor_state.lacp_activity variable is TRUE or both
+ * the actor's actor_oper_port_state.lacp_activity and the PDU's
+ * partner_state.lacp_activity variables are TRUE.
+ *
+ * Note: the AD_PORT_MATCHED "variable" is not specified by 802.3ad; it is
+ * used here to implement the language from 802.3ad 43.4.9 that requires
+ * recordPDU to "match" the LACPDU parameters to the stored values.
+ */
+static void __choose_matched(struct lacpdu *lacpdu, struct port *port)
+{
+ // check if all parameters are alike
+ if (((ntohs(lacpdu->partner_port) == port->actor_port_number) &&
+ (ntohs(lacpdu->partner_port_priority) == port->actor_port_priority) &&
+ !MAC_ADDRESS_COMPARE(&(lacpdu->partner_system), &(port->actor_system)) &&
+ (ntohs(lacpdu->partner_system_priority) == port->actor_system_priority) &&
+ (ntohs(lacpdu->partner_key) == port->actor_oper_port_key) &&
+ ((lacpdu->partner_state & AD_STATE_AGGREGATION) == (port->actor_oper_port_state & AD_STATE_AGGREGATION))) ||
+ // or this is individual link(aggregation == FALSE)
+ ((lacpdu->actor_state & AD_STATE_AGGREGATION) == 0)
+ ) {
+ // update the state machine Matched variable
+ port->sm_vars |= AD_PORT_MATCHED;
+ } else {
+ port->sm_vars &= ~AD_PORT_MATCHED;
+ }
+}
+
+/**
* __record_pdu - record parameters from a received lacpdu
* @lacpdu: the lacpdu we've received
* @port: the port we're looking at
@@ -459,6 +501,7 @@ static void __record_pdu(struct lacpdu *lacpdu, struct port *port)
if (lacpdu && port) {
struct port_params *partner = &port->partner_oper;
+ __choose_matched(lacpdu, port);
// record the new parameter values for the partner operational
partner->port_number = ntohs(lacpdu->actor_port);
partner->port_priority = ntohs(lacpdu->actor_port_priority);
@@ -563,47 +606,6 @@ static void __update_default_selected(struct port *port)
}
/**
- * __choose_matched - update a port's matched variable from a received lacpdu
- * @lacpdu: the lacpdu we've received
- * @port: the port we're looking at
- *
- * Update the value of the matched variable, using parameter values from a
- * newly received lacpdu. Parameter values for the partner carried in the
- * received PDU are compared with the corresponding operational parameter
- * values for the actor. Matched is set to TRUE if all of these parameters
- * match and the PDU parameter partner_state.aggregation has the same value as
- * actor_oper_port_state.aggregation and lacp will actively maintain the link
- * in the aggregation. Matched is also set to TRUE if the value of
- * actor_state.aggregation in the received PDU is set to FALSE, i.e., indicates
- * an individual link and lacp will actively maintain the link. Otherwise,
- * matched is set to FALSE. LACP is considered to be actively maintaining the
- * link if either the PDU's actor_state.lacp_activity variable is TRUE or both
- * the actor's actor_oper_port_state.lacp_activity and the PDU's
- * partner_state.lacp_activity variables are TRUE.
- */
-static void __choose_matched(struct lacpdu *lacpdu, struct port *port)
-{
- // validate lacpdu and port
- if (lacpdu && port) {
- // check if all parameters are alike
- if (((ntohs(lacpdu->partner_port) == port->actor_port_number) &&
- (ntohs(lacpdu->partner_port_priority) == port->actor_port_priority) &&
- !MAC_ADDRESS_COMPARE(&(lacpdu->partner_system), &(port->actor_system)) &&
- (ntohs(lacpdu->partner_system_priority) == port->actor_system_priority) &&
- (ntohs(lacpdu->partner_key) == port->actor_oper_port_key) &&
- ((lacpdu->partner_state & AD_STATE_AGGREGATION) == (port->actor_oper_port_state & AD_STATE_AGGREGATION))) ||
- // or this is individual link(aggregation == FALSE)
- ((lacpdu->actor_state & AD_STATE_AGGREGATION) == 0)
- ) {
- // update the state machine Matched variable
- port->sm_vars |= AD_PORT_MATCHED;
- } else {
- port->sm_vars &= ~AD_PORT_MATCHED;
- }
- }
-}
-
-/**
* __update_ntt - update a port's ntt variable from a received lacpdu
* @lacpdu: the lacpdu we've received
* @port: the port we're looking at
@@ -1134,7 +1136,6 @@ static void ad_rx_machine(struct lacpdu *lacpdu, struct port *port)
__update_selected(lacpdu, port);
__update_ntt(lacpdu, port);
__record_pdu(lacpdu, port);
- __choose_matched(lacpdu, port);
port->sm_rx_timer_counter = __ad_timer_to_ticks(AD_CURRENT_WHILE_TIMER, (u16)(port->actor_oper_port_state & AD_STATE_LACP_TIMEOUT));
port->actor_oper_port_state &= ~AD_STATE_EXPIRED;
// verify that if the aggregator is enabled, the port is enabled too.