summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>2008-04-12 15:20:59 +1000
committerPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>2008-04-15 21:22:17 +1000
commitd9024df02ffe74d723d97d552f86de3b34beb8cc (patch)
tree6e753db66f4404526d6c22a41a3a050dc156db72
parent300613e523d53f346f8ff0256921e289da39ed7b (diff)
[LMB] Restructure allocation loops to avoid unsigned underflow
There is a potential bug in __lmb_alloc_base where we subtract `size' from the base address of a reserved region without checking whether the subtraction could wrap around and produce a very large unsigned value. In fact it probably isn't possible to hit the bug in practice since it would only occur in the situation where we can't satisfy the allocation request and there is a reserved region starting at 0. This fixes the potential bug by breaking out of the loop when we get to the point where the base of the reserved region is less than the size requested. This also restructures the loop to be a bit easier to follow. The same logic got copied into lmb_alloc_nid_unreserved, so this makes a similar change there. Here the bug is more likely to be hit because the outer loop (in lmb_alloc_nid) goes through the memory regions in increasing order rather than decreasing order as __lmb_alloc_base does, and we are therefore more likely to hit the case where we are testing against a reserved region with a base address of 0. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-rw-r--r--lib/lmb.c56
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/lib/lmb.c b/lib/lmb.c
index e4bbc617f46..896e2832099 100644
--- a/lib/lmb.c
+++ b/lib/lmb.c
@@ -230,20 +230,23 @@ static u64 lmb_align_up(u64 addr, u64 size)
static u64 __init lmb_alloc_nid_unreserved(u64 start, u64 end,
u64 size, u64 align)
{
- u64 base;
+ u64 base, res_base;
long j;
base = lmb_align_down((end - size), align);
- while (start <= base &&
- ((j = lmb_overlaps_region(&lmb.reserved, base, size)) >= 0))
- base = lmb_align_down(lmb.reserved.region[j].base - size,
- align);
-
- if (base != 0 && start <= base) {
- if (lmb_add_region(&lmb.reserved, base,
- lmb_align_up(size, align)) < 0)
- base = ~(u64)0;
- return base;
+ while (start <= base) {
+ j = lmb_overlaps_region(&lmb.reserved, base, size);
+ if (j < 0) {
+ /* this area isn't reserved, take it */
+ if (lmb_add_region(&lmb.reserved, base,
+ lmb_align_up(size, align)) < 0)
+ base = ~(u64)0;
+ return base;
+ }
+ res_base = lmb.reserved.region[j].base;
+ if (res_base < size)
+ break;
+ base = lmb_align_down(res_base - size, align);
}
return ~(u64)0;
@@ -315,10 +318,12 @@ u64 __init __lmb_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
{
long i, j;
u64 base = 0;
+ u64 res_base;
BUG_ON(0 == size);
/* On some platforms, make sure we allocate lowmem */
+ /* Note that LMB_REAL_LIMIT may be LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE */
if (max_addr == LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
max_addr = LMB_REAL_LIMIT;
@@ -326,6 +331,8 @@ u64 __init __lmb_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
u64 lmbbase = lmb.memory.region[i].base;
u64 lmbsize = lmb.memory.region[i].size;
+ if (lmbsize < size)
+ continue;
if (max_addr == LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
base = lmb_align_down(lmbbase + lmbsize - size, align);
else if (lmbbase < max_addr) {
@@ -334,25 +341,22 @@ u64 __init __lmb_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
} else
continue;
- while (lmbbase <= base) {
+ while (base && lmbbase <= base) {
j = lmb_overlaps_region(&lmb.reserved, base, size);
- if (j < 0)
+ if (j < 0) {
+ /* this area isn't reserved, take it */
+ if (lmb_add_region(&lmb.reserved, base,
+ size) < 0)
+ return 0;
+ return base;
+ }
+ res_base = lmb.reserved.region[j].base;
+ if (res_base < size)
break;
- base = lmb_align_down(lmb.reserved.region[j].base - size,
- align);
+ base = lmb_align_down(res_base - size, align);
}
-
- if ((base != 0) && (lmbbase <= base))
- break;
}
-
- if (i < 0)
- return 0;
-
- if (lmb_add_region(&lmb.reserved, base, lmb_align_up(size, align)) < 0)
- return 0;
-
- return base;
+ return 0;
}
/* You must call lmb_analyze() before this. */