diff options
| author | Casey Leedom <leedom@chelsio.com> | 2010-06-29 12:53:39 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2010-06-30 13:57:11 -0700 |
| commit | 64bb336c8f4de8b281d0d44f2ec2c900b9b28466 (patch) | |
| tree | dbc0ed4027c3c3cafa4876f7bf10b5db26a4e7cb | |
| parent | d6bebca92c663fb216c072193945946f3807ca7f (diff) | |
cxgb4vf: Remove obsolete comment about the lack of a TX Timer Callback
Remove obsolete comment about the lack of a TX Timer Callback -- which
we now _do_ have ...
Signed-off-by: Casey Leedom <leedom@chelsio.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/cxgb4vf/sge.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/cxgb4vf/sge.c b/drivers/net/cxgb4vf/sge.c index f857d20e1d3..5c4a81dae19 100644 --- a/drivers/net/cxgb4vf/sge.c +++ b/drivers/net/cxgb4vf/sge.c @@ -1301,18 +1301,7 @@ int t4vf_eth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) * wait for acks to really free up the data the extra memory * is even less. On the positive side we run the destructors * on the sending CPU rather than on a potentially different - * completing CPU, usually a good thing. We also run them - * without holding our TX queue lock, unlike what - * reclaim_completed_tx() would otherwise do. - * - * XXX Actually the above is somewhat incorrect since we don't - * XXX yet have a periodic timer which reclaims TX Descriptors. - * XXX What's our plan for this? - * XXX - * XXX Also, we don't currently have a TX Queue lock but - * XXX that may be the result of not having any current - * XXX asynchronous path for reclaiming completed TX - * XXX Descriptors ... + * completing CPU, usually a good thing. * * Run the destructor before telling the DMA engine about the * packet to make sure it doesn't complete and get freed |