diff options
| author | Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com> | 2009-11-26 09:41:21 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> | 2009-11-26 09:46:46 +0100 |
| commit | c16632bab1a17e357cec66920ceb3f0630009360 (patch) | |
| tree | 6937755404314252f0bf2c46eec374c32c12f8b1 | |
| parent | 2d4dc890b5c8fabd818a8586607e6843c4375e62 (diff) | |
cfq-iosched: cleanup unreachable code
cfq_should_idle returns false for no-idle queues that are not the last,
so the control flow will never reach the removed code in a state that
satisfies the if condition.
The unreachable code was added to emulate previous cfq behaviour for
non-NCQ rotational devices. My tests show that even without it, the
performances and fairness are comparable with previous cfq, thanks to
the fact that all seeky queues are grouped together, and that we idle at
the end of the tree.
Signed-off-by: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | block/cfq-iosched.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c index 467981e19d7..c2ef5d17608 100644 --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c @@ -1269,19 +1269,6 @@ static void cfq_arm_slice_timer(struct cfq_data *cfqd) cfq_mark_cfqq_wait_request(cfqq); sl = cfqd->cfq_slice_idle; - /* are we servicing noidle tree, and there are more queues? - * non-rotational or NCQ: no idle - * non-NCQ rotational : very small idle, to allow - * fair distribution of slice time for a process doing back-to-back - * seeks. - */ - if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD && - service_tree_for(cfqd->serving_prio, SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD, cfqd) - ->count > 0) { - if (blk_queue_nonrot(cfqd->queue) || cfqd->hw_tag) - return; - sl = min(sl, msecs_to_jiffies(CFQ_MIN_TT)); - } mod_timer(&cfqd->idle_slice_timer, jiffies + sl); cfq_log_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, "arm_idle: %lu", sl); |