summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>2007-11-24 22:12:06 -0200
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2008-01-28 14:55:01 -0800
commitdcfbc7e97a2e3a0d73a2e41e1bddb988dcca701e (patch)
tree72f3e847a2cff031e8d9d7728065716da3ca0be9
parenta302002516a094015e5d004b8d939a8a34559c82 (diff)
[CCID2]: Remove misleading comment
This removes a comment which identifies an `issue' with dccp_write_xmit() where there is none. The comment assumes it is possible that a packet is sent between the calls to ccid_hc_tx_send_packet(), dccp_transmit_skb(), ccid_hc_tx_packet_sent() (in the above order) in dccp_write_xmit(). I think that this is impossible, since dccp_write_xmit() is always called under lock: * when called as dccp_write_xmit(sk, 1) from dccp_send_close(), the socket is locked (see code comment above dccp_send_close()); * when called as dccp_write_xmit(sk, 0) from dccp_send_msg(), it is after lock_sock() has been called; * when called as dccp_write_xmit(sk, 0) from dccp_write_xmit_timer(), bh_lock_sock() has been called and the if/else statement has made sure that sk_lock.owner is not set; * there are no other places where dccp_write_xmit() is called. Furthermore, the debug statement for printing the sequence number of the packet just sent has been removed, since the entire list is being printed anyway and so the entry of that number appears last. Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Acked-by: Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@jandi.co.nz> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r--net/dccp/ccids/ccid2.c11
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/net/dccp/ccids/ccid2.c b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid2.c
index 02d126d9a71..48eeb4494e8 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ccids/ccid2.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid2.c
@@ -228,18 +228,10 @@ static void ccid2_hc_tx_packet_sent(struct sock *sk, int more, unsigned int len)
struct dccp_sock *dp = dccp_sk(sk);
struct ccid2_hc_tx_sock *hctx = ccid2_hc_tx_sk(sk);
struct ccid2_seq *next;
- u64 seq;
hctx->ccid2hctx_pipe++;
- /* There is an issue. What if another packet is sent between
- * packet_send() and packet_sent(). Then the sequence number would be
- * wrong.
- * -sorbo.
- */
- seq = dp->dccps_gss;
-
- hctx->ccid2hctx_seqh->ccid2s_seq = seq;
+ hctx->ccid2hctx_seqh->ccid2s_seq = dp->dccps_gss;
hctx->ccid2hctx_seqh->ccid2s_acked = 0;
hctx->ccid2hctx_seqh->ccid2s_sent = jiffies;
@@ -313,7 +305,6 @@ static void ccid2_hc_tx_packet_sent(struct sock *sk, int more, unsigned int len)
ccid2_start_rto_timer(sk);
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_DCCP_CCID2_DEBUG
- ccid2_pr_debug("Sent: seq=%llu\n", (unsigned long long)seq);
do {
struct ccid2_seq *seqp = hctx->ccid2hctx_seqt;