summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAleksi Torhamo <aleksi@torhamo.net>2013-01-09 20:08:48 +0200
committerBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>2013-01-13 18:07:46 +1000
commit43f789792e2c7ea2bff37195e4c4b4239e9e02b7 (patch)
tree9f8dfb6f8d727b231f573483c15db30232c16b47
parentd19528a9e4f220519c2cb3f56ef0c84ead3ee440 (diff)
drm/nvc0/fb: fix crash when different mutex is used to protect same list
Fixes regression introduced in commit 861d2107 "drm/nouveau/fb: merge fb/vram and port to subdev interfaces" nv50_fb_vram_{new,del} functions were changed to use nouveau_subdev->mutex instead of the old nouveau_mm->mutex. nvc0_fb_vram_new still uses the nouveau_mm->mutex, but nvc0 doesn't have its own fb_vram_del function, using nv50_fb_vram_del instead. Because of this, on nvc0 a different mutex ends up being used to protect additions and deletions to the same list. This patch is a -stable candidate for 3.7. Signed-off-by: Aleksi Torhamo <aleksi@torhamo.net> Reported-by: Roy Spliet <r.spliet@student.tudelft.nl> Tested-by: Roy Spliet <r.spliet@student.tudelft.nl> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c
index 306bdf12145..7606ed15b6f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c
@@ -145,14 +145,14 @@ nvc0_fb_vram_new(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, u64 size, u32 align, u32 ncmin,
mem->memtype = type;
mem->size = size;
- mutex_lock(&mm->mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&pfb->base.mutex);
do {
if (back)
ret = nouveau_mm_tail(mm, 1, size, ncmin, align, &r);
else
ret = nouveau_mm_head(mm, 1, size, ncmin, align, &r);
if (ret) {
- mutex_unlock(&mm->mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&pfb->base.mutex);
pfb->ram.put(pfb, &mem);
return ret;
}
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ nvc0_fb_vram_new(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, u64 size, u32 align, u32 ncmin,
list_add_tail(&r->rl_entry, &mem->regions);
size -= r->length;
} while (size);
- mutex_unlock(&mm->mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&pfb->base.mutex);
r = list_first_entry(&mem->regions, struct nouveau_mm_node, rl_entry);
mem->offset = (u64)r->offset << 12;