diff options
| author | Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com> | 2005-07-01 12:11:51 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> | 2005-07-01 12:11:51 +0100 |
| commit | db5795547694cf68388aaf8f59723e850f7466f6 (patch) | |
| tree | 9e552a91ea498c9494fe8aa940fd8c2952f87676 | |
| parent | c77b042700ae1fc4d661d7d62787899e755160d5 (diff) | |
[PATCH] ARM: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()
Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task
delays as expected. Neither signals nor wait-queue events are
important at this point in the code, I believe.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c index 8d2a89a2ea0..04c94ab6c18 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c @@ -271,8 +271,7 @@ static int sa1110_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, */ sdram_set_refresh(2); if (!irqs_disabled()) { - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); - schedule_timeout(20 * HZ / 1000); + msleep(20); } else { mdelay(20); } |