diff options
| author | Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@gmail.com> | 2012-12-20 15:05:44 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2012-12-20 17:40:20 -0800 |
| commit | ee297209bf0a25c6717b7c063e76795142d32f37 (patch) | |
| tree | 7783b18e70c4bd5856727f6db4100a3b45ffb23b | |
| parent | c4e18497d8fd92eef2c6e7eadcc1a107ccd115ea (diff) | |
proc: fix inconsistent lock state
Lockdep found an inconsistent lock state when rcu is processing delayed
work in softirq. Currently, kernel is using spin_lock/spin_unlock to
protect proc_inum_ida, but proc_free_inum is called by rcu in softirq
context.
Use spin_lock_bh/spin_unlock_bh fix following lockdep warning.
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
3.7.0 #36 Not tainted
---------------------------------
inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
swapper/1/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
(proc_inum_lock){+.?...}, at: proc_free_inum+0x1c/0x50
{SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
__lock_acquire+0x8ae/0xca0
lock_acquire+0x199/0x200
_raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50
proc_alloc_inum+0x4c/0xd0
alloc_mnt_ns+0x49/0xc0
create_mnt_ns+0x25/0x70
mnt_init+0x161/0x1c7
vfs_caches_init+0x107/0x11a
start_kernel+0x348/0x38c
x86_64_start_reservations+0x131/0x136
x86_64_start_kernel+0x103/0x112
irq event stamp: 2993422
hardirqs last enabled at (2993422): _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x55/0x80
hardirqs last disabled at (2993421): _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x29/0x70
softirqs last enabled at (2993394): _local_bh_enable+0x13/0x20
softirqs last disabled at (2993395): call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(proc_inum_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(proc_inum_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
no locks held by swapper/1/0.
stack backtrace:
Pid: 0, comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.7.0 #36
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff810a40f1>] ? vprintk_emit+0x471/0x510
print_usage_bug+0x2a5/0x2c0
mark_lock+0x33b/0x5e0
__lock_acquire+0x813/0xca0
lock_acquire+0x199/0x200
_raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50
proc_free_inum+0x1c/0x50
free_pid_ns+0x1c/0x50
put_pid_ns+0x2e/0x50
put_pid+0x4a/0x60
delayed_put_pid+0x12/0x20
rcu_process_callbacks+0x462/0x790
__do_softirq+0x1b4/0x3b0
call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
do_softirq+0x59/0xd0
irq_exit+0x54/0xd0
smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x95/0xa3
apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x80
cpuidle_enter_tk+0x10/0x20
cpuidle_enter_state+0x17/0x50
cpuidle_idle_call+0x287/0x520
cpu_idle+0xba/0x130
start_secondary+0x2b3/0x2bc
Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <dannyfeng@tencent.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/proc/generic.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/fs/proc/generic.c b/fs/proc/generic.c index 7b3ae3cc0ef..e659a0ff1da 100644 --- a/fs/proc/generic.c +++ b/fs/proc/generic.c @@ -359,18 +359,18 @@ retry: if (!ida_pre_get(&proc_inum_ida, GFP_KERNEL)) return -ENOMEM; - spin_lock(&proc_inum_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&proc_inum_lock); error = ida_get_new(&proc_inum_ida, &i); - spin_unlock(&proc_inum_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&proc_inum_lock); if (error == -EAGAIN) goto retry; else if (error) return error; if (i > UINT_MAX - PROC_DYNAMIC_FIRST) { - spin_lock(&proc_inum_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&proc_inum_lock); ida_remove(&proc_inum_ida, i); - spin_unlock(&proc_inum_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&proc_inum_lock); return -ENOSPC; } *inum = PROC_DYNAMIC_FIRST + i; @@ -379,9 +379,9 @@ retry: void proc_free_inum(unsigned int inum) { - spin_lock(&proc_inum_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&proc_inum_lock); ida_remove(&proc_inum_ida, inum - PROC_DYNAMIC_FIRST); - spin_unlock(&proc_inum_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&proc_inum_lock); } static void *proc_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) |