diff options
| author | Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> | 2009-02-28 04:44:32 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2009-03-02 03:00:11 -0800 |
| commit | d0af4160d19ff2849386140881e729f9ba86f2aa (patch) | |
| tree | d9582acc750f249839602316a129eddb59e21acb | |
| parent | 02276f3c962fd408fa9d441251067845f948bfcf (diff) | |
tcp: remove redundant code from tcp_mark_lost_retrans
Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de> noticed and was
puzzled by the fact that !tcp_is_fack(tp) leads to early return
near the beginning and the later on tcp_is_fack(tp) was still
used in an if condition. The later check was a left-over from
RFC3517 SACK stuff (== !tcp_is_fack(tp) behavior nowadays) as
there wasn't clear way how to handle this particular check
cheaply in the spirit of RFC3517 (using only SACK blocks, not
holes + SACK blocks as with FACK). I sort of left it there as
a reminder but since it's confusing other people just remove
it and comment the missing-feature stuff instead.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Cc: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 3f2f09091bc..125b4517f36 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -1178,10 +1178,18 @@ static void tcp_mark_lost_retrans(struct sock *sk) if (!(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_RETRANS)) continue; - if (after(received_upto, ack_seq) && - (tcp_is_fack(tp) || - !before(received_upto, - ack_seq + tp->reordering * tp->mss_cache))) { + /* TODO: We would like to get rid of tcp_is_fack(tp) only + * constraint here (see above) but figuring out that at + * least tp->reordering SACK blocks reside between ack_seq + * and received_upto is not easy task to do cheaply with + * the available datastructures. + * + * Whether FACK should check here for tp->reordering segs + * in-between one could argue for either way (it would be + * rather simple to implement as we could count fack_count + * during the walk and do tp->fackets_out - fack_count). + */ + if (after(received_upto, ack_seq)) { TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked &= ~TCPCB_SACKED_RETRANS; tp->retrans_out -= tcp_skb_pcount(skb); |