diff options
author | Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> | 2010-02-26 17:25:14 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2010-02-26 17:22:35 -0800 |
commit | 4912002fffa377e66c5caefc2c311732a4ad5fb8 (patch) | |
tree | 52b9028af4886dcc7507c121dd27d8b9a143728a | |
parent | 98723153dc32106e5be701da15551853c9f785a9 (diff) |
Remove EXPERIMENTAL from NFS_FSCACHE
There's currently an open Ubuntu bug[0], with the intent to compile NFS_FSCACHE
(and possibly AFS_FSCACHE, 9P_FSCACHE) into the standard Ubuntu kernel.
However, since *_FSCACHE still depends on EXPERIMENTAL, this won't happen.
As Arjan van de Ven pointed out[1], the EXPERIMENTAL flag doesn't mean that
much any more, I propose the following patch to fs/nfs/Kconfig. I'd do the
same for fs/9p/Kconfig and fs/afs/Kconfig, but as I did not test 9p or AFS, I
feel it would not be appropriate for me to remove the flag.
[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/440522/comments/5
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/23/145
Signed-off-by: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | fs/nfs/Kconfig | 3 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nfs/Kconfig b/fs/nfs/Kconfig index 59e5673b459..a43d07e7b92 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/nfs/Kconfig @@ -95,8 +95,7 @@ config ROOT_NFS Most people say N here. config NFS_FSCACHE - bool "Provide NFS client caching support (EXPERIMENTAL)" - depends on EXPERIMENTAL + bool "Provide NFS client caching support" depends on NFS_FS=m && FSCACHE || NFS_FS=y && FSCACHE=y help Say Y here if you want NFS data to be cached locally on disc through |