diff options
| author | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2008-09-14 14:50:26 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2008-09-14 14:53:00 +0200 |
| commit | a1c75cc5018f17ff6d80ce45a13435b1536f76db (patch) | |
| tree | 2b6e394379fe2035f26c4853b4cd462019b9e0a4 | |
| parent | a0a29b62a9cac6b7d83b7514679f2ed8d33d4372 (diff) | |
x86, microcode rework, v2, fix
based on patch from Dmitry Adamushko.
- add missing vfree()
- update debug printks
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 4 |
3 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c index 902dada2eb6..0c2634f4fd7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c @@ -70,8 +70,6 @@ * Fix sigmatch() macro to handle old CPUs with pf == 0. * Thanks to Stuart Swales for pointing out this bug. */ - -/* #define DEBUG pr_debug */ #include <linux/capability.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/init.h> @@ -396,7 +394,7 @@ static int mc_sysdev_resume(struct sys_device *dev) if (!cpu_online(cpu)) return 0; - pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d resumed\n", cpu); + /* only CPU 0 will apply ucode here */ microcode_update_cpu(0); return 0; diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c index 6815837a775..48aec9f48e4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev) unsigned int i = 0; /* - * dimm: do we need this? Why an update via /dev/... is different + * FIXME! dimm: do we need this? Why an update via /dev/... is different * from the one via firmware? * * This is a tricky part. We might be called from a write operation @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void * get_next_ucode(u8 *buf, unsigned int size, return NULL; } - /* Why not by means of get_totalsize(hdr)? */ + /* FIXME! dimm: Why not by means of get_totalsize(hdr)? */ total_size = (unsigned long) (hdr[4] + (hdr[5] << 8)); printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: size %u, total_size %u\n", @@ -342,6 +342,8 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size, mc_header = (struct microcode_header_amd *)mc; if (get_matching_microcode(cpu, mc, new_rev)) { + if (new_mc) + vfree(new_mc); new_rev = mc_header->patch_id; new_mc = mc; } else diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c index f4930b55c6a..48ed3cef58c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c @@ -70,8 +70,6 @@ * Fix sigmatch() macro to handle old CPUs with pf == 0. * Thanks to Stuart Swales for pointing out this bug. */ - -/* #define DEBUG */ /* pr_debug */ #include <linux/capability.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/init.h> @@ -356,6 +354,8 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size, } if (get_matching_microcode(&uci->cpu_sig, mc, new_rev)) { + if (new_mc) + vfree(new_mc); new_rev = mc_header.rev; new_mc = mc; } else |