diff options
| author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.osdl.org> | 2006-11-22 09:32:06 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.osdl.org> | 2006-11-22 09:32:06 -0800 |
| commit | b42172fc7b569a0ef2b0fa38d71382969074c0e2 (patch) | |
| tree | 2fe6141c936421d339a9443a6ad6af4dd4d2386b | |
| parent | 0f9005a6f7a82f4aacbd72f7b92322a8ca1c3f97 (diff) | |
Don't call "note_interrupt()" with irq descriptor lock held
This reverts commit f72fa707604c015a6625e80f269506032d5430dc, and solves
the problem that it tried to fix by simply making "__do_IRQ()" call the
note_interrupt() function without the lock held, the way everybody else
does.
It should be noted that all interrupt handling code must never allow the
descriptor actors to be entered "recursively" (that's why we do all the
magic IRQ_PENDING stuff in the first place), so there actually is
exclusion at that much higher level, even in the absense of locking.
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Acked-by:Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/irq/handle.c | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/irq/spurious.c | 6 |
2 files changed, 3 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c index 42aa6f1a3f0..a681912bc89 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/handle.c +++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c @@ -231,10 +231,10 @@ fastcall unsigned int __do_IRQ(unsigned int irq) spin_unlock(&desc->lock); action_ret = handle_IRQ_event(irq, action); - - spin_lock(&desc->lock); if (!noirqdebug) note_interrupt(irq, desc, action_ret); + + spin_lock(&desc->lock); if (likely(!(desc->status & IRQ_PENDING))) break; desc->status &= ~IRQ_PENDING; diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c index 9c7e2e4c1fe..543ea2e5ad9 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c +++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c @@ -147,11 +147,7 @@ void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, if (unlikely(irqfixup)) { /* Don't punish working computers */ if ((irqfixup == 2 && irq == 0) || action_ret == IRQ_NONE) { - int ok; - - spin_unlock(&desc->lock); - ok = misrouted_irq(irq); - spin_lock(&desc->lock); + int ok = misrouted_irq(irq); if (action_ret == IRQ_NONE) desc->irqs_unhandled -= ok; } |