diff options
author | James Morris <jmorris@macbook.(none)> | 2009-12-03 12:03:40 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | James Morris <jmorris@macbook.(none)> | 2009-12-03 12:03:40 +0530 |
commit | c84d6efd363a3948eb32ec40d46bab6338580454 (patch) | |
tree | 3ba7ac46e6626fe8ac843834588609eb6ccee5c6 /Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | |
parent | 7539cf4b92be4aecc573ea962135f246a7a33401 (diff) | |
parent | 22763c5cf3690a681551162c15d34d935308c8d7 (diff) |
Merge branch 'master' into next
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 38 |
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt index 89a47b5aff0..bc693fffabe 100644 --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt @@ -418,6 +418,14 @@ When: 2.6.33 Why: Should be implemented in userspace, policy daemon. Who: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> +--------------------------- + +What: CONFIG_INOTIFY +When: 2.6.33 +Why: last user (audit) will be converted to the newer more generic + and more easily maintained fsnotify subsystem +Who: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> + ---------------------------- What: lock_policy_rwsem_* and unlock_policy_rwsem_* will not be @@ -451,3 +459,33 @@ Why: OSS sound_core grabs all legacy minors (0-255) of SOUND_MAJOR will also allow making ALSA OSS emulation independent of sound_core. The dependency will be broken then too. Who: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> + +---------------------------- + +What: Support for VMware's guest paravirtuliazation technique [VMI] will be + dropped. +When: 2.6.37 or earlier. +Why: With the recent innovations in CPU hardware acceleration technologies + from Intel and AMD, VMware ran a few experiments to compare these + techniques to guest paravirtualization technique on VMware's platform. + These hardware assisted virtualization techniques have outperformed the + performance benefits provided by VMI in most of the workloads. VMware + expects that these hardware features will be ubiquitous in a couple of + years, as a result, VMware has started a phased retirement of this + feature from the hypervisor. We will be removing this feature from the + Kernel too. Right now we are targeting 2.6.37 but can retire earlier if + technical reasons (read opportunity to remove major chunk of pvops) + arise. + + Please note that VMI has always been an optimization and non-VMI kernels + still work fine on VMware's platform. + Latest versions of VMware's product which support VMI are, + Workstation 7.0 and VSphere 4.0 on ESX side, future maintainence + releases for these products will continue supporting VMI. + + For more details about VMI retirement take a look at this, + http://blogs.vmware.com/guestosguide/2009/09/vmi-retirement.html + +Who: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com> + +---------------------------- |