diff options
| author | Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> | 2010-07-23 20:51:24 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> | 2010-08-04 15:21:40 +0200 |
| commit | 0ea6e61122196509af82cc4f36cbdaacbefb8227 (patch) | |
| tree | 1e6e65d3b73c9c620497966b1786f163a1782228 /Documentation/mtd/nand_ecc.txt | |
| parent | d790d4d583aeaed9fc6f8a9f4d9f8ce6b1c15c7f (diff) | |
Documentation: update broken web addresses.
Below you will find an updated version from the original series bunching all patches into one big patch
updating broken web addresses that are located in Documentation/*
Some of the addresses date as far far back as 1995 etc... so searching became a bit difficult,
the best way to deal with these is to use web.archive.org to locate these addresses that are outdated.
Now there are also some addresses pointing to .spec files some are located, but some(after searching
on the companies site)where still no where to be found. In this case I just changed the address
to the company site this way the users can contact the company and they can locate them for the users.
Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weber <weber@corscience.de>
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/mtd/nand_ecc.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/mtd/nand_ecc.txt | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/mtd/nand_ecc.txt b/Documentation/mtd/nand_ecc.txt index 274821b35a7..990efd7a981 100644 --- a/Documentation/mtd/nand_ecc.txt +++ b/Documentation/mtd/nand_ecc.txt @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ ECC 1 rp15 rp14 rp13 rp12 rp11 rp10 rp09 rp08 ECC 2 cp5 cp4 cp3 cp2 cp1 cp0 1 1 I detected after writing this that ST application note AN1823 -(http://www.st.com/stonline/books/pdf/docs/10123.pdf) gives a much +(http://www.st.com/stonline/) gives a much nicer picture.(but they use line parity as term where I use row parity) Oh well, I'm graphically challenged, so suffer with me for a moment :-) And I could not reuse the ST picture anyway for copyright reasons. |