summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>2009-11-19 18:10:57 +0000
committerDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>2009-11-19 18:10:57 +0000
commit3bde31a4ac225cb5805be02eff6eaaf7e0766ccd (patch)
tree9fb757ab7d46e0c37fb5e88d3185f1861fbc794e /Documentation
parent31ba99d304494cb28fa8671ccc769c5543e1165d (diff)
SLOW_WORK: Allow a requeueable work item to sleep till the thread is needed
Add a function to allow a requeueable work item to sleep till the thread processing it is needed by the slow-work facility to perform other work. Sometimes a work item can't progress immediately, but must wait for the completion of another work item that's currently being processed by another slow-work thread. In some circumstances, the waiting item could instead - theoretically - put itself back on the queue and yield its thread back to the slow-work facility, thus waiting till it gets processing time again before attempting to progress. This would allow other work items processing time on that thread. However, this only works if there is something on the queue for it to queue behind - otherwise it will just get a thread again immediately, and will end up cycling between the queue and the thread, eating up valuable CPU time. So, slow_work_sleep_till_thread_needed() is provided such that an item can put itself on a wait queue that will wake it up when the event it is actually interested in occurs, then call this function in lieu of calling schedule(). This function will then sleep until either the item's event occurs or another work item appears on the queue. If another work item is queued, but the item's event hasn't occurred, then the work item should requeue itself and yield the thread back to the slow-work facility by returning. This can be used by CacheFiles for an object that is being created on one thread to wait for an object being deleted on another thread where there is nothing on the queue for the creation to go and wait behind. As soon as an item appears on the queue that could be given thread time instead, CacheFiles can stick the creating object back on the queue and return to the slow-work facility - assuming the object deletion didn't also complete. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/slow-work.txt44
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/slow-work.txt b/Documentation/slow-work.txt
index 0169c9d9dd1..52bc3143372 100644
--- a/Documentation/slow-work.txt
+++ b/Documentation/slow-work.txt
@@ -158,6 +158,50 @@ with a requeue pending). This can be used to work out whether an item on which
another depends is on the queue, thus allowing a dependent item to be queued
after it.
+If the above shows an item on which another depends not to be queued, then the
+owner of the dependent item might need to wait. However, to avoid locking up
+the threads unnecessarily be sleeping in them, it can make sense under some
+circumstances to return the work item to the queue, thus deferring it until
+some other items have had a chance to make use of the yielded thread.
+
+To yield a thread and defer an item, the work function should simply enqueue
+the work item again and return. However, this doesn't work if there's nothing
+actually on the queue, as the thread just vacated will jump straight back into
+the item's work function, thus busy waiting on a CPU.
+
+Instead, the item should use the thread to wait for the dependency to go away,
+but rather than using schedule() or schedule_timeout() to sleep, it should use
+the following function:
+
+ bool requeue = slow_work_sleep_till_thread_needed(
+ struct slow_work *work,
+ signed long *_timeout);
+
+This will add a second wait and then sleep, such that it will be woken up if
+either something appears on the queue that could usefully make use of the
+thread - and behind which this item can be queued, or if the event the caller
+set up to wait for happens. True will be returned if something else appeared
+on the queue and this work function should perhaps return, of false if
+something else woke it up. The timeout is as for schedule_timeout().
+
+For example:
+
+ wq = bit_waitqueue(&my_flags, MY_BIT);
+ init_wait(&wait);
+ requeue = false;
+ do {
+ prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ if (!test_bit(MY_BIT, &my_flags))
+ break;
+ requeue = slow_work_sleep_till_thread_needed(&my_work,
+ &timeout);
+ } while (timeout > 0 && !requeue);
+ finish_wait(wq, &wait);
+ if (!test_bit(MY_BIT, &my_flags)
+ goto do_my_thing;
+ if (requeue)
+ return; // to slow_work
+
===============
ITEM OPERATIONS