diff options
author | Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> | 2013-06-14 16:14:14 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> | 2013-06-17 21:35:25 +0100 |
commit | 19ab428f4b7988ef3ac727c680efc193ef53ce14 (patch) | |
tree | 7cdce88e40ca449db2fea719b88a423f884e1157 /arch/arm/kernel/process.c | |
parent | 69f91ff8c93c778cb65b71d9b2d95ff62956354f (diff) |
ARM: 7759/1: decouple CPU offlining from reboot/shutdown
Add comments to machine_shutdown()/halt()/power_off()/restart() that
describe their purpose and/or requirements re: CPUs being active/not.
In machine_shutdown(), replace the call to smp_send_stop() with a call to
disable_nonboot_cpus(). This completely disables all but one CPU, thus
satisfying the requirement that only a single CPU be active for kexec.
Adjust Kconfig dependencies for this change.
In machine_halt()/power_off()/restart(), call smp_send_stop() directly,
rather than via machine_shutdown(); these functions don't need to
completely de-activate all CPUs using hotplug, but rather just quiesce
them.
Remove smp_kill_cpus(), and its call from smp_send_stop().
smp_kill_cpus() was indirectly calling smp_ops.cpu_kill() without calling
smp_ops.cpu_die() on the target CPUs first. At least some implementations
of smp_ops had issues with this; it caused cpu_kill() to hang on Tegra,
for example. Since smp_send_stop() is only used for shutdown, halt, and
power-off, there is no need to attempt any kind of CPU hotplug here.
Adjust Kconfig to reflect that machine_shutdown() (and hence kexec)
relies upon disable_nonboot_cpus(). However, this alone doesn't guarantee
that hotplug will work, or even that hotplug is implemented for a
particular piece of HW that a multi-platform zImage runs on. Hence, add
error-checking to machine_kexec() to determine whether it did work.
Suggested-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Tested-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/kernel/process.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 43 |
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c index 282de4826ab..6e8931ccf13 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c @@ -184,30 +184,61 @@ int __init reboot_setup(char *str) __setup("reboot=", reboot_setup); +/* + * Called by kexec, immediately prior to machine_kexec(). + * + * This must completely disable all secondary CPUs; simply causing those CPUs + * to execute e.g. a RAM-based pin loop is not sufficient. This allows the + * kexec'd kernel to use any and all RAM as it sees fit, without having to + * avoid any code or data used by any SW CPU pin loop. The CPU hotplug + * functionality embodied in disable_nonboot_cpus() to achieve this. + */ void machine_shutdown(void) { -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP - smp_send_stop(); -#endif + disable_nonboot_cpus(); } +/* + * Halting simply requires that the secondary CPUs stop performing any + * activity (executing tasks, handling interrupts). smp_send_stop() + * achieves this. + */ void machine_halt(void) { - machine_shutdown(); + smp_send_stop(); + local_irq_disable(); while (1); } +/* + * Power-off simply requires that the secondary CPUs stop performing any + * activity (executing tasks, handling interrupts). smp_send_stop() + * achieves this. When the system power is turned off, it will take all CPUs + * with it. + */ void machine_power_off(void) { - machine_shutdown(); + smp_send_stop(); + if (pm_power_off) pm_power_off(); } +/* + * Restart requires that the secondary CPUs stop performing any activity + * while the primary CPU resets the system. Systems with a single CPU can + * use soft_restart() as their machine descriptor's .restart hook, since that + * will cause the only available CPU to reset. Systems with multiple CPUs must + * provide a HW restart implementation, to ensure that all CPUs reset at once. + * This is required so that any code running after reset on the primary CPU + * doesn't have to co-ordinate with other CPUs to ensure they aren't still + * executing pre-reset code, and using RAM that the primary CPU's code wishes + * to use. Implementing such co-ordination would be essentially impossible. + */ void machine_restart(char *cmd) { - machine_shutdown(); + smp_send_stop(); arm_pm_restart(reboot_mode, cmd); |