ASoC: davinci: fixes for multi-component

Multi-component commit f0fba2ad broke a few things which this patch should
fix. Tested on the DM355 EVM. I've been as careful as I can, but it would be
good if those with access to other Davinci boards could test.

--

The multi-component commit put the initialisation of
snd_soc_dai.[capture|playback]_dma_data into snd_soc_dai_ops.hw_params of the
McBSP, McASP & VCIF drivers (davinci-i2s.c, davinci-mcasp.c & davinci-vcif.c).
The initialisation had to be moved from the probe function in these drivers
because davinci_*_dai changed from snd_soc_dai to snd_soc_dai_driver.

Unfortunately, the DMA params pointer is needed by davinci_pcm_open (in
davinci-pcm.c) before hw_params is called. I have moved the initialisation to
a new snd_soc_dai_ops.startup function in each of these drivers. This fix
indicates that all platforms that use davinci-pcm must have been broken and
need to test with this fix.

--

The multi-component commit also changed the McBSP driver name from
"davinci-asp" to "davinci-i2s" in davinci-i2s.c without updating the board
level references to the driver name. This change is understandable, as there
is a similarly named "davinci-mcasp" driver in davinci-mcasp.c.

There is probably no 'correct' name for this driver. The DM6446 datasheet
calls it the "ASP" and describes it as a "specialised McBSP". The DM355
datasheet calls it the "ASP" and describes it as a "specialised ASP". The
DM365 datasheet calls it the "McBSP". Rather than fix this problem by
reverting to "davinci-asp", I've elected to avoid future confusion with the
"davinci-mcasp" driver by changing it to "davinci-mcbsp", which is also
consistent with the names of the functions in the driver. There are other
fixes required, so it was never going to be as simple as a revert anyway.

--

The DM365 only has one McBSP port (of the McBSP platforms, only the DM355 has
2 ports), so I've changed the the id of the platform_device from 0 to -1.

--

In davinci-evm.c, the DM6446 EVM can no longer share a snd_soc_dai_link
structure with the DM355 EVM as they use different cpu DAI names (the DM355
has 2 ports and the EVM uses the second port, but the DM6446 only has 1 port).
This also means that the 2 boards need different snd_soc_card structures.

--

The codec_name entries in davinci-evm.c didn't match the i2c ids in the board
files. I have only checked and fixed the details of the names used for the
McBSP based platforms. Someone with a McASP based platform (eg DA8xx) should
check the others.

Signed-off-by: Chris Paulson-Ellis <chris@edesix.com>
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
index 9be261beae7..2652af124ac 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
@@ -359,8 +359,8 @@ static struct clk_lookup dm355_clks[] = {
 	CLK(NULL, "uart1", &uart1_clk),
 	CLK(NULL, "uart2", &uart2_clk),
 	CLK("i2c_davinci.1", NULL, &i2c_clk),
-	CLK("davinci-asp.0", NULL, &asp0_clk),
-	CLK("davinci-asp.1", NULL, &asp1_clk),
+	CLK("davinci-mcbsp.0", NULL, &asp0_clk),
+	CLK("davinci-mcbsp.1", NULL, &asp1_clk),
 	CLK("davinci_mmc.0", NULL, &mmcsd0_clk),
 	CLK("davinci_mmc.1", NULL, &mmcsd1_clk),
 	CLK("spi_davinci.0", NULL, &spi0_clk),
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static struct resource dm355_asp1_resources[] = {
 };
 
 static struct platform_device dm355_asp1_device = {
-	.name		= "davinci-asp",
+	.name		= "davinci-mcbsp",
 	.id		= 1,
 	.num_resources	= ARRAY_SIZE(dm355_asp1_resources),
 	.resource	= dm355_asp1_resources,