[ARM] pxa: add support for additional GPIOs on PXA26x

Original patch from Marek Vasut, the problems with PXA26x are:

1. there are additional 4 GPIOs 86,87,88,89 have their direction bits
   inverted in GPDR2, as well as their alternate function bits being
   '1' for their GPIO functionality in GAFRx

2. there is no easy way to decide if the processor is a pxa26x or a
   pxa250/pxa255 at run-time, so the assumption here is the pxa26x
   will be treated as one of the pxa25x variants, and board code
   should have a better knowledge of the processor it is featured

Introduce pxa26x_init_irq() for the second purpose, and treat the
additional GPIOs > 85 on PXA25x specially.

Kconfig option CONFIG_CPU_PXA26x is introduced to optimize the code
a bit when PXA26x support isn't needed. Board config options have
to select this to enable the support for PXA26x.

__gpio_is_inverted() will be optimized way when CONFIG_CPU_PXA26x
isn't selected.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>

1 files changed, 37 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/gpio.c
index 14930cf8be7..843144ff1f6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/gpio.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/gpio.c
@@ -33,6 +33,18 @@ struct pxa_gpio_chip {
 
 int pxa_last_gpio;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PXA26x
+/* GPIO86/87/88/89 on PXA26x have their direction bits in GPDR2 inverted,
+ * as well as their Alternate Function value being '1' for GPIO in GAFRx.
+ */
+static int __gpio_is_inverted(unsigned gpio)
+{
+	return cpu_is_pxa25x() && gpio > 85;
+}
+#else
+#define __gpio_is_inverted(gpio)	(0)
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Configure pins for GPIO or other functions
  */
@@ -75,7 +87,10 @@ static int pxa_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
 	gpdr = pxa->regbase + GPDR_OFFSET;
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	value = __raw_readl(gpdr);
-	value &= ~mask;
+	if (__gpio_is_inverted(chip->base + offset))
+		value |= mask;
+	else
+		value &= ~mask;
 	__raw_writel(value, gpdr);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
@@ -97,7 +112,10 @@ static int pxa_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
 	gpdr = pxa->regbase + GPDR_OFFSET;
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	tmp = __raw_readl(gpdr);
-	tmp |= mask;
+	if (__gpio_is_inverted(chip->base + offset))
+		tmp &= ~mask;
+	else
+		tmp |= mask;
 	__raw_writel(tmp, gpdr);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
@@ -173,10 +191,17 @@ static unsigned long GPIO_IRQ_mask[4];
  */
 static int __gpio_is_occupied(unsigned gpio)
 {
-	if (cpu_is_pxa25x() || cpu_is_pxa27x())
-		return GAFR(gpio) & (0x3 << (((gpio) & 0xf) * 2));
-	else
-		return 0;
+	if (cpu_is_pxa27x() || cpu_is_pxa25x()) {
+		int af = (GAFR(gpio) >> ((gpio & 0xf) * 2)) & 0x3;
+		int dir = GPDR(gpio) & GPIO_bit(gpio);
+
+		if (__gpio_is_inverted(gpio))
+			return af != 1 || dir == 0;
+		else
+			return af != 0 || dir != 0;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int pxa_gpio_irq_type(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type)
@@ -190,9 +215,8 @@ static int pxa_gpio_irq_type(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type)
 		/* Don't mess with enabled GPIOs using preconfigured edges or
 		 * GPIOs set to alternate function or to output during probe
 		 */
-		if ((GPIO_IRQ_rising_edge[idx] |
-		     GPIO_IRQ_falling_edge[idx] |
-		     GPDR(gpio)) & GPIO_bit(gpio))
+		if ((GPIO_IRQ_rising_edge[idx] & GPIO_bit(gpio)) ||
+		    (GPIO_IRQ_falling_edge[idx] & GPIO_bit(gpio)))
 			return 0;
 
 		if (__gpio_is_occupied(gpio))
@@ -201,7 +225,10 @@ static int pxa_gpio_irq_type(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type)
 		type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING;
 	}
 
-	GPDR(gpio) &= ~GPIO_bit(gpio);
+	if (__gpio_is_inverted(gpio))
+		GPDR(gpio) |= GPIO_bit(gpio);
+	else
+		GPDR(gpio) &= ~GPIO_bit(gpio);
 
 	if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
 		__set_bit(gpio, GPIO_IRQ_rising_edge);