mv643xx_eth: Place explicit port number in mv643xx_eth_platform_data

We were using the platform_device.id field to identify which ethernet
port is used for mv643xx_eth device.  This is not generally correct.
It will be incorrect, for example, if a hardware platform uses a single
port but not the first port.  Here, we add an explicit port_number field
to struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data.

This makes the mv643xx_eth_platform_data structure required, but that
isn't an issue since all users currently provide it already.

Signed-off-by: Dale Farnsworth <dale@farnsworth.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/arch/ppc/syslib/mv64x60.c b/arch/ppc/syslib/mv64x60.c
index 3b039c30a43..a6f8b686ea8 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/syslib/mv64x60.c
+++ b/arch/ppc/syslib/mv64x60.c
@@ -339,7 +339,9 @@ static struct resource mv64x60_eth0_resources[] = {
 	},
 };
 
-static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data eth0_pd;
+static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data eth0_pd = {
+	.port_number	= 0,
+};
 
 static struct platform_device eth0_device = {
 	.name		= MV643XX_ETH_NAME,
@@ -362,7 +364,9 @@ static struct resource mv64x60_eth1_resources[] = {
 	},
 };
 
-static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data eth1_pd;
+static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data eth1_pd = {
+	.port_number	= 1,
+};
 
 static struct platform_device eth1_device = {
 	.name		= MV643XX_ETH_NAME,
@@ -385,7 +389,9 @@ static struct resource mv64x60_eth2_resources[] = {
 	},
 };
 
-static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data eth2_pd;
+static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data eth2_pd = {
+	.port_number	= 2,
+};
 
 static struct platform_device eth2_device = {
 	.name		= MV643XX_ETH_NAME,