x86, mem: Don't implement forward memmove() as memcpy()

memmove() allow source and destination address to be overlap, but
there is no such limitation for memcpy().  Therefore, explicitly
implement memmove() in both the forwards and backward directions, to
give us the ability to optimize memcpy().

Signed-off-by: Ma Ling <ling.ma@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <C10D3FB0CD45994C8A51FEC1227CE22F0E483AD86A@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

1 files changed, 41 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.c b/arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.c
index 0a33909bf12..ecacc4b3d9e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.c
@@ -8,13 +8,49 @@
 #undef memmove
 void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t count)
 {
+	unsigned long d0, d1, d2, d3;
 	if (dest < src) {
-		return memcpy(dest, src, count);
+		if ((dest + count) < src)
+			 return memcpy(dest, src, count);
+		else
+			__asm__ __volatile__(
+				"movq %0, %3\n\t"
+				"shr $3, %0\n\t"
+				"andq $7, %3\n\t"
+				"rep\n\t"
+				"movsq\n\t"
+				"movq %3, %0\n\t"
+				"rep\n\t"
+				"movsb"
+				: "=&c" (d0), "=&S" (d1), "=&D" (d2), "=r" (d3)
+				:"0" (count),
+				 "1" (src),
+				 "2" (dest)
+				:"memory");
 	} else {
-		char *p = dest + count;
-		const char *s = src + count;
-		while (count--)
-			*--p = *--s;
+		if((src + count) < dest)
+			return memcpy(dest, src, count);
+		else
+			__asm__ __volatile__(
+				"movq %0, %3\n\t"
+				"lea -8(%1, %0), %1\n\t"
+				"lea -8(%2, %0), %2\n\t"
+				"shr $3, %0\n\t"
+				"andq $7, %3\n\t"
+				"std\n\t"
+				"rep\n\t"
+				"movsq\n\t"
+				"lea 7(%1), %1\n\t"
+				"lea 7(%2), %2\n\t"
+				"movq %3, %0\n\t"
+				"rep\n\t"
+				"movsb\n\t"
+				"cld"
+				: "=&c" (d0), "=&S" (d1), "=&D" (d2), "=r" (d3)
+				:"0" (count),
+				 "1" (src),
+				 "2" (dest)
+				:"memory");
 	}
 	return dest;
 }