x86: Use memblock to replace early_res

1. replace find_e820_area with memblock_find_in_range
2. replace reserve_early with memblock_x86_reserve_range
3. replace free_early with memblock_x86_free_range.
4. NO_BOOTMEM will switch to use memblock too.
5. use _e820, _early wrap in the patch, in following patch, will
   replace them all
6. because memblock_x86_free_range support partial free, we can remove some special care
7. Need to make sure that memblock_find_in_range() is called after memblock_x86_fill()
   so adjust some calling later in setup.c::setup_arch()
   -- corruption_check and mptable_update

-v2: Move reserve_brk() early
    Before fill_memblock_area, to avoid overlap between brk and memblock_find_in_range()
    that could happen We have more then 128 RAM entry in E820 tables, and
    memblock_x86_fill() could use memblock_find_in_range() to find a new place for
    memblock.memory.region array.
    and We don't need to use extend_brk() after fill_memblock_area()
    So move reserve_brk() early before fill_memblock_area().
-v3: Move find_smp_config early
    To make sure memblock_find_in_range not find wrong place, if BIOS doesn't put mptable
    in right place.
-v4: Treat RESERVED_KERN as RAM in memblock.memory. and they are already in
    memblock.reserved already..
    use __NOT_KEEP_MEMBLOCK to make sure memblock related code could be freed later.
-v5: Generic version __memblock_find_in_range() is going from high to low, and for 32bit
    active_region for 32bit does include high pages
    need to replace the limit with memblock.default_alloc_limit, aka get_max_mapped()
-v6: Use current_limit instead
-v7: check with MEMBLOCK_ERROR instead of -1ULL or -1L
-v8: Set memblock_can_resize early to handle EFI with more RAM entries
-v9: update after kmemleak changes in mainline

Suggested-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Suggested-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index a7bcc23ef96..3d54f9f95d4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/bootmem.h>
+#include <linux/memblock.h>
 #include <linux/mmzone.h>
 #include <linux/ctype.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -171,8 +172,8 @@ static void * __init early_node_mem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
 	if (start < (MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT) &&
 	    end > (MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT))
 		start = MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT;
-	mem = find_e820_area(start, end, size, align);
-	if (mem != -1L)
+	mem = memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(nodeid, start, end, size, align);
+	if (mem != MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
 		return __va(mem);
 
 	/* extend the search scope */
@@ -181,8 +182,8 @@ static void * __init early_node_mem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
 		start = MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT;
 	else
 		start = MAX_DMA_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT;
-	mem = find_e820_area(start, end, size, align);
-	if (mem != -1L)
+	mem = memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(nodeid, start, end, size, align);
+	if (mem != MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
 		return __va(mem);
 
 	printk(KERN_ERR "Cannot find %lu bytes in node %d\n",