diff options
author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2011-02-16 17:11:09 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2011-02-16 17:11:09 +0100 |
commit | 4697bdcc945c094d2c8a4876a24faeaf31a283e0 (patch) | |
tree | 709191c472d60a7394ba6d775ef6548748ba621d /arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | |
parent | 92d4a4371eeb89e1e12b9ebbed0956f499b6c2c0 (diff) |
x86-64, NUMA: Kill mem_nodes_parsed
With all memory configuration information now carried in numa_meminfo,
there's no need to keep mem_nodes_parsed separate. Drop it and use
numa_nodes_parsed for CPU / memory-less nodes.
A new helper numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() is added to calculate
memnode mask on the fly which is currently used to set
node_possible_map.
This simplifies NUMA init methods a bit and removes a source of
possible inconsistencies.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c index 6e4fbd77756..8b1f178a866 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly; EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_data); nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata; -nodemask_t mem_nodes_parsed __initdata; struct memnode memnode; @@ -344,6 +343,20 @@ static int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi) } /* + * Set nodes, which have memory in @mi, in *@nodemask. + */ +static void __init numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(nodemask_t *nodemask, + const struct numa_meminfo *mi) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mi->blk); i++) + if (mi->blk[i].start != mi->blk[i].end && + mi->blk[i].nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) + node_set(mi->blk[i].nid, *nodemask); +} + +/* * Sanity check to catch more bad NUMA configurations (they are amazingly * common). Make sure the nodes cover all memory. */ @@ -379,7 +392,8 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi) int i, j, nid; /* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */ - nodes_or(node_possible_map, mem_nodes_parsed, numa_nodes_parsed); + node_possible_map = numa_nodes_parsed; + numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(&node_possible_map, mi); if (WARN_ON(nodes_empty(node_possible_map))) return -EINVAL; @@ -824,7 +838,6 @@ static int dummy_numa_init(void) 0LU, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT); node_set(0, numa_nodes_parsed); - node_set(0, mem_nodes_parsed); numa_add_memblk(0, 0, (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT); return 0; @@ -852,7 +865,6 @@ void __init initmem_init(void) set_apicid_to_node(j, NUMA_NO_NODE); nodes_clear(numa_nodes_parsed); - nodes_clear(mem_nodes_parsed); nodes_clear(node_possible_map); nodes_clear(node_online_map); memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo)); |