summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/cpufreq
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2014-04-16 11:35:38 +0530
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2014-04-21 23:43:38 +0200
commitf3cae355a962784101478504ef7f6a389ad62979 (patch)
tree56bcd073b7a7e83dc787c419bda33b1fc7794129 /drivers/cpufreq
parent8ab4e2b30a0921d819b196d34ce58f19c3e0270b (diff)
cpufreq, powernv: Fix build failure on UP
Paul Gortmaker reported the following build failure of the powernv cpufreq driver on UP configs: drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:241:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_sibling_mask' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] cc1: some warnings being treated as errors make[3]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq] Error 2 make[1]: *** [drivers] Error 2 make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 The trouble here is that cpu_sibling_mask is defined only in <asm/smp.h>, and <linux/smp.h> includes <asm/smp.h> only in SMP builds. So fix this build failure by explicitly including <asm/smp.h> in the driver, so that we get the definition of cpu_sibling_mask even in UP configurations. Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq')
-rw-r--r--drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
index 9edccc63245..af4968813e7 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <asm/cputhreads.h>
#include <asm/reg.h>
+#include <asm/smp.h> /* Required for cpu_sibling_mask() in UP configs */
#define POWERNV_MAX_PSTATES 256