diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-02-14 11:05:41 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-02-14 11:05:41 -0800 |
commit | 3bd354abe17f2c8aa426ef84b78f14e505f0a920 (patch) | |
tree | bdaed9ba35a7b6fdce76ae4086309b644f1afd37 /drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | |
parent | cbc252566c09ad4ab14a40813d4feac4228571cb (diff) | |
parent | cb6ef42e516cb8948f15e4b70dc03af8020050a2 (diff) |
Merge tag 'edac_for_3.14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp
Pull EDAC fixes from Borislav Petkov:
"Fix polling timeout setting through sysfs.
You're surely wondering why the patches are not based on an rc. Well,
Andrew sent you 79040cad3f82 ("drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c: poll
timeout cannot be zero sent you") already (it got in in -rc2) but it
is not enough as a fix because for one, setting too low polling
intervals (< 1sec) don't make any sense and cause unnecessary polling
load on the system.
Then, even if we set some interval, we explode with
[ 4143.094342] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at kernel/workqueue.c:1393 __queue_work+0x1d7/0x340()
because the workqueue setup path is used also for the timeout period
resetting and we're doing INIT_DELAYED_WORK() on an already active
workqueue. Which is total bollocks. So this is taken care of by the
second patch.
I've CCed stable for those two"
* tag 'edac_for_3.14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp:
EDAC: Correct workqueue setup path
EDAC: Poll timeout cannot be zero, p2
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/edac/edac_mc.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c index e8c9ef03495..33edd676634 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c @@ -559,7 +559,8 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_function(struct work_struct *work_req) * * called with the mem_ctls_mutex held */ -static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec) +static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec, + bool init) { edac_dbg(0, "\n"); @@ -567,7 +568,9 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec) if (mci->op_state != OP_RUNNING_POLL) return; - INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function); + if (init) + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function); + mod_delayed_work(edac_workqueue, &mci->work, msecs_to_jiffies(msec)); } @@ -601,7 +604,7 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_teardown(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) * user space has updated our poll period value, need to * reset our workq delays */ -void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(int value) +void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(unsigned long value) { struct mem_ctl_info *mci; struct list_head *item; @@ -611,7 +614,7 @@ void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(int value) list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) { mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link); - edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, (unsigned long) value); + edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, value, false); } mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex); @@ -782,7 +785,7 @@ int edac_mc_add_mc(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) /* This instance is NOW RUNNING */ mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_POLL; - edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec()); + edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec(), true); } else { mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_INTERRUPT; } |