diff options
| author | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2014-05-14 15:40:34 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2014-05-21 11:32:06 +0200 |
| commit | c5ab3bc07e252a32b170ab4797142ef117c367a0 (patch) | |
| tree | 68f319a72d7279fc25af17546a2ba4b93107079f /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | |
| parent | fd68e2379ba56afda1db5bae4d1563f088bbc0c8 (diff) | |
drm/i915: Accurately initialize fifo underrun state on gmch platforms
We don't have hardware based disable bits on gmch platforms, so need
to block spurious underrun reports in software. Which means that we
_must_ start out with fifo underrun reporting disabled everywhere.
This is in big contrast to ilk/hsw/cpt where there's only _one_
disable bit for all platforms and hence we must allow underrun
reporting on disabled pipes. Otherwise nothing really works,
especially the CRC support since that's key'ed off the same irq
disable bit.
This allows us to ditch the fifo underrun reporting hack from the vlv
runtime pm code and unexport the internal function from i915_irq.c
again. Yay!
v2: Keep the display irq disabling, spotted by Imre.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index eda804f04dc..83fe9be03f5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -11504,11 +11504,18 @@ static void intel_sanitize_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc) encoder->base.crtc = NULL; } } - if (crtc->active) { + + if (crtc->active || IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 5) { /* * We start out with underrun reporting disabled to avoid races. * For correct bookkeeping mark this on active crtcs. * + * Also on gmch platforms we dont have any hardware bits to + * disable the underrun reporting. Which means we need to start + * out with underrun reporting disabled also on inactive pipes, + * since otherwise we'll complain about the garbage we read when + * e.g. coming up after runtime pm. + * * No protection against concurrent access is required - at * worst a fifo underrun happens which also sets this to false. */ |