Merge tag 'v3.9-rc5' into wq/for-3.10

Writeback conversion to workqueue will be based on top of wq/for-3.10
branch to take advantage of custom attrs and NUMA support for unbound
workqueues.  Mainline currently contains two commits which result in
non-trivial merge conflicts with wq/for-3.10 and because
block/for-3.10/core is based on v3.9-rc3 which contains one of the
conflicting commits, we need a pre-merge-window merge anyway.  Let's
pull v3.9-rc5 into wq/for-3.10 so that the block tree doesn't suffer
from workqueue merge conflicts.

The two conflicts and their resolutions:

* e68035fb65 ("workqueue: convert to idr_alloc()") in mainline changes
  worker_pool_assign_id() to use idr_alloc() instead of the old idr
  interface.  worker_pool_assign_id() goes through multiple locking
  changes in wq/for-3.10 causing the following conflict.

  static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
  {
	  int ret;

  <<<<<<< HEAD
	  lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);

	  do {
		  if (!idr_pre_get(&worker_pool_idr, GFP_KERNEL))
			  return -ENOMEM;
		  ret = idr_get_new(&worker_pool_idr, pool, &pool->id);
	  } while (ret == -EAGAIN);
  =======
	  mutex_lock(&worker_pool_idr_mutex);
	  ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
	  if (ret >= 0)
		  pool->id = ret;
	  mutex_unlock(&worker_pool_idr_mutex);
  >>>>>>> c67bf5361e7e66a0ff1f4caf95f89347d55dfb89

	  return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
  }

  We want locking from the former and idr_alloc() usage from the
  latter, which can be combined to the following.

  static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
  {
	  int ret;

	  lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);

	  ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
	  if (ret >= 0) {
		  pool->id = ret;
		  return 0;
	  }
	  return ret;
   }

* eb2834285c ("workqueue: fix possible pool stall bug in
  wq_unbind_fn()") updated wq_unbind_fn() such that it has single
  larger for_each_std_worker_pool() loop instead of two separate loops
  with a schedule() call inbetween.  wq/for-3.10 renamed
  pool->assoc_mutex to pool->manager_mutex causing the following
  conflict (earlier function body and comments omitted for brevity).

  static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
  {
  ...
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
  <<<<<<< HEAD
		  mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
	  }
  =======
		  mutex_unlock(&pool->assoc_mutex);
  >>>>>>> c67bf5361e7e66a0ff1f4caf95f89347d55dfb89

		  schedule();

  <<<<<<< HEAD
	  for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)
  =======
  >>>>>>> c67bf5361e7e66a0ff1f4caf95f89347d55dfb89
		  atomic_set(&pool->nr_running, 0);

		  spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
		  wake_up_worker(pool);
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
	  }
  }

  The resolution is mostly trivial.  We want the control flow of the
  latter with the rename of the former.

  static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
  {
  ...
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
		  mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);

		  schedule();

		  atomic_set(&pool->nr_running, 0);

		  spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
		  wake_up_worker(pool);
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
	  }
  }

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 24 insertions, 22 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c
index c4f28133ef8..b88757cd0d1 100644
--- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c
+++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c
@@ -139,15 +139,8 @@ struct child {
 	struct btree_node *n;
 };
 
-static struct dm_btree_value_type le64_type = {
-	.context = NULL,
-	.size = sizeof(__le64),
-	.inc = NULL,
-	.dec = NULL,
-	.equal = NULL
-};
-
-static int init_child(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct btree_node *parent,
+static int init_child(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct dm_btree_value_type *vt,
+		      struct btree_node *parent,
 		      unsigned index, struct child *result)
 {
 	int r, inc;
@@ -164,7 +157,7 @@ static int init_child(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct btree_node *parent,
 	result->n = dm_block_data(result->block);
 
 	if (inc)
-		inc_children(info->tm, result->n, &le64_type);
+		inc_children(info->tm, result->n, vt);
 
 	*((__le64 *) value_ptr(parent, index)) =
 		cpu_to_le64(dm_block_location(result->block));
@@ -236,7 +229,7 @@ static void __rebalance2(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct btree_node *parent,
 }
 
 static int rebalance2(struct shadow_spine *s, struct dm_btree_info *info,
-		      unsigned left_index)
+		      struct dm_btree_value_type *vt, unsigned left_index)
 {
 	int r;
 	struct btree_node *parent;
@@ -244,11 +237,11 @@ static int rebalance2(struct shadow_spine *s, struct dm_btree_info *info,
 
 	parent = dm_block_data(shadow_current(s));
 
-	r = init_child(info, parent, left_index, &left);
+	r = init_child(info, vt, parent, left_index, &left);
 	if (r)
 		return r;
 
-	r = init_child(info, parent, left_index + 1, &right);
+	r = init_child(info, vt, parent, left_index + 1, &right);
 	if (r) {
 		exit_child(info, &left);
 		return r;
@@ -368,7 +361,7 @@ static void __rebalance3(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct btree_node *parent,
 }
 
 static int rebalance3(struct shadow_spine *s, struct dm_btree_info *info,
-		      unsigned left_index)
+		      struct dm_btree_value_type *vt, unsigned left_index)
 {
 	int r;
 	struct btree_node *parent = dm_block_data(shadow_current(s));
@@ -377,17 +370,17 @@ static int rebalance3(struct shadow_spine *s, struct dm_btree_info *info,
 	/*
 	 * FIXME: fill out an array?
 	 */
-	r = init_child(info, parent, left_index, &left);
+	r = init_child(info, vt, parent, left_index, &left);
 	if (r)
 		return r;
 
-	r = init_child(info, parent, left_index + 1, &center);
+	r = init_child(info, vt, parent, left_index + 1, &center);
 	if (r) {
 		exit_child(info, &left);
 		return r;
 	}
 
-	r = init_child(info, parent, left_index + 2, &right);
+	r = init_child(info, vt, parent, left_index + 2, &right);
 	if (r) {
 		exit_child(info, &left);
 		exit_child(info, &center);
@@ -434,7 +427,8 @@ static int get_nr_entries(struct dm_transaction_manager *tm,
 }
 
 static int rebalance_children(struct shadow_spine *s,
-			      struct dm_btree_info *info, uint64_t key)
+			      struct dm_btree_info *info,
+			      struct dm_btree_value_type *vt, uint64_t key)
 {
 	int i, r, has_left_sibling, has_right_sibling;
 	uint32_t child_entries;
@@ -472,13 +466,13 @@ static int rebalance_children(struct shadow_spine *s,
 	has_right_sibling = i < (le32_to_cpu(n->header.nr_entries) - 1);
 
 	if (!has_left_sibling)
-		r = rebalance2(s, info, i);
+		r = rebalance2(s, info, vt, i);
 
 	else if (!has_right_sibling)
-		r = rebalance2(s, info, i - 1);
+		r = rebalance2(s, info, vt, i - 1);
 
 	else
-		r = rebalance3(s, info, i - 1);
+		r = rebalance3(s, info, vt, i - 1);
 
 	return r;
 }
@@ -529,7 +523,7 @@ static int remove_raw(struct shadow_spine *s, struct dm_btree_info *info,
 		if (le32_to_cpu(n->header.flags) & LEAF_NODE)
 			return do_leaf(n, key, index);
 
-		r = rebalance_children(s, info, key);
+		r = rebalance_children(s, info, vt, key);
 		if (r)
 			break;
 
@@ -550,6 +544,14 @@ static int remove_raw(struct shadow_spine *s, struct dm_btree_info *info,
 	return r;
 }
 
+static struct dm_btree_value_type le64_type = {
+	.context = NULL,
+	.size = sizeof(__le64),
+	.inc = NULL,
+	.dec = NULL,
+	.equal = NULL
+};
+
 int dm_btree_remove(struct dm_btree_info *info, dm_block_t root,
 		    uint64_t *keys, dm_block_t *new_root)
 {