summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>2013-03-04 09:43:20 -0300
committerMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>2013-03-18 17:35:24 -0300
commitb78a1f372210ae8c19426cb3ae708bf85aa70124 (patch)
tree13b82936910daeeac5b4f2c6e46fd6eed743e637 /drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c
parent445ba89f1cbdb3058e83e6727bb249d1cb48b582 (diff)
[media] m920x: let GCC see 'ret' is used initialized
Since commit 7543f344e9b06afe86b55a2620f5c11b38bd5642 ("[media] m920x: factor out a m920x_write_seq() function") building m920x.o triggers this GCC warning: drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c: In function ‘m920x_probe’: drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c:91:6: warning: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] This warning is caused by m920x_write_seq(), which is apparently inlined into m920x_probe(). It is clear why GCC thinks 'ret' may be used uninitialized. But in practice the first seq->address will always be non-zero when this function is called. That means we can change the while()-do{} loop into a do{}-while() loop. And that suffices to make GCC see that 'ret' will not be used uninitialized. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c
index 92afeb20650..79b31ae66a9 100644
--- a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c
@@ -68,13 +68,13 @@ static inline int m920x_write_seq(struct usb_device *udev, u8 request,
struct m920x_inits *seq)
{
int ret;
- while (seq->address) {
+ do {
ret = m920x_write(udev, request, seq->data, seq->address);
if (ret != 0)
return ret;
seq++;
- }
+ } while (seq->address);
return ret;
}