summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-cards.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>2010-10-07 03:33:00 -0300
committerMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>2010-10-21 01:17:46 -0200
commitbae94dc39e9530842379208c4406512d34dc7ef3 (patch)
tree309b10639370e4bee3036ad960c2041abeecacb3 /drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-cards.c
parent955e6ed843ddddb57cf599584574c505175cd86f (diff)
[media] cx231xx-417: Fix a gcc warning
gcc didn't like to have i++ inside a complex operation: drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c: In function ‘cx231xx_load_firmware’: drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:1059: warning: operation on ‘i’ may be undefined drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:1061: warning: operation on ‘i’ may be undefined drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:1063: warning: operation on ‘i’ may be undefined Btw, I agree with gcc, as we're using i and i++ at the same operation and, depending on how optimization may occur, it may produce a wrong code. While here, fix CodingStyle issues on the changed code. Acked-by: Sri Deevi <Srinivasa.Deevi@conexant.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-cards.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions