diff options
author | Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> | 2009-07-24 11:13:03 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> | 2009-07-27 15:24:21 -0400 |
commit | 46f9381aa3fb62f6a141bfd41dcbeda1ec5fa26e (patch) | |
tree | 1023c715eac2b99b4443afbfefddb52719923593 /drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c | |
parent | 39b73fb15e4704fd4d1e33688135810637f5f3fb (diff) |
iwlwifi: Thermal Throttling Management - part 2
Part 2 of Thermal Throttling Management -
Thermal Throttling feature is used to put NIC into low power state when
driver detect the Radio temperature reach pre-defined threshold
Two Thermal Throttling Management Methods; this patch introduce the
Advance Thermal Throttling:
TI-0: system power index, no tx/rx restriction, HT enabled
TI-1: power index 5, 1 spatial stream Tx, multiple spatial stream Rx, HT
enabled
TI-2: power index 5: 1 spatial stream Tx, 1 spatial stream Rx, HT
disabled
TI-CT-KILL: power index 5, no Tx, no Rx, HT disabled
For advance Thermal Throttling, CT_KILL_ENTER threshold and CT_KILL_EXIT
threshold are different; uCode will not stay awake until reach
CT_KILL_EXIT threshold.
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c | 48 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c index 40207dac6db..52a4810274e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static void rs_rate_scale_perform(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta); -static void rs_fill_link_cmd(const struct iwl_priv *priv, +static void rs_fill_link_cmd(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta, u32 rate_n_flags); @@ -1398,6 +1398,12 @@ static int rs_move_legacy_other(struct iwl_priv *priv, int ret = 0; u8 update_search_tbl_counter = 0; + if (!iwl_ht_enabled(priv)) + /* stay in Legacy */ + tbl->action = IWL_LEGACY_SWITCH_ANTENNA1; + else if (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_TX_SINGLE && + tbl->action > IWL_LEGACY_SWITCH_SISO) + tbl->action = IWL_LEGACY_SWITCH_SISO; for (; ;) { lq_sta->action_counter++; switch (tbl->action) { @@ -1529,6 +1535,11 @@ static int rs_move_siso_to_other(struct iwl_priv *priv, u8 update_search_tbl_counter = 0; int ret; + if (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_TX_SINGLE && + tbl->action > IWL_SISO_SWITCH_ANTENNA2) { + /* stay in SISO */ + tbl->action = IWL_SISO_SWITCH_ANTENNA1; + } for (;;) { lq_sta->action_counter++; switch (tbl->action) { @@ -1663,6 +1674,12 @@ static int rs_move_mimo2_to_other(struct iwl_priv *priv, u8 update_search_tbl_counter = 0; int ret; + if ((iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_TX_SINGLE) && + (tbl->action < IWL_MIMO2_SWITCH_SISO_A || + tbl->action > IWL_MIMO2_SWITCH_SISO_C)) { + /* switch in SISO */ + tbl->action = IWL_MIMO2_SWITCH_SISO_A; + } for (;;) { lq_sta->action_counter++; switch (tbl->action) { @@ -1799,6 +1816,12 @@ static int rs_move_mimo3_to_other(struct iwl_priv *priv, int ret; u8 update_search_tbl_counter = 0; + if ((iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_TX_SINGLE) && + (tbl->action < IWL_MIMO3_SWITCH_SISO_A || + tbl->action > IWL_MIMO3_SWITCH_SISO_C)) { + /* switch in SISO */ + tbl->action = IWL_MIMO3_SWITCH_SISO_A; + } for (;;) { lq_sta->action_counter++; switch (tbl->action) { @@ -2178,8 +2201,8 @@ static void rs_rate_scale_perform(struct iwl_priv *priv, tbl->expected_tpt[index] + 64) / 128)); /* If we are searching for better modulation mode, check success. */ - if (lq_sta->search_better_tbl) { - + if (lq_sta->search_better_tbl && + (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_TX_MULTI)) { /* If good success, continue using the "search" mode; * no need to send new link quality command, since we're * continuing to use the setup that we've been trying. */ @@ -2307,7 +2330,11 @@ static void rs_rate_scale_perform(struct iwl_priv *priv, ((sr > IWL_RATE_HIGH_TH) || (current_tpt > (100 * tbl->expected_tpt[low])))) scale_action = 0; - + if (!iwl_ht_enabled(priv) && !is_legacy(tbl->lq_type)) + scale_action = -1; + if (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) != IWL_TX_MULTI && + (is_mimo2(tbl->lq_type) || is_mimo3(tbl->lq_type))) + scale_action = -1; switch (scale_action) { case -1: /* Decrease starting rate, update uCode's rate table */ @@ -2341,9 +2368,11 @@ lq_update: rate = rs_update_rate_tbl(priv, lq_sta, tbl, index, is_green); - /* Should we stay with this modulation mode, or search for a new one? */ - rs_stay_in_table(lq_sta); - + if (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_TX_MULTI) { + /* Should we stay with this modulation mode, + * or search for a new one? */ + rs_stay_in_table(lq_sta); + } /* * Search for new modulation mode if we're: * 1) Not changing rates right now @@ -2400,7 +2429,8 @@ lq_update: * have been tried and compared, stay in this best modulation * mode for a while before next round of mode comparisons. */ if (lq_sta->enable_counter && - (lq_sta->action_counter >= tbl1->max_search)) { + (lq_sta->action_counter >= tbl1->max_search) && + iwl_ht_enabled(priv)) { if ((lq_sta->last_tpt > IWL_AGG_TPT_THREHOLD) && (lq_sta->tx_agg_tid_en & (1 << tid)) && (tid != MAX_TID_COUNT)) { @@ -2686,7 +2716,7 @@ static void rs_rate_init(void *priv_r, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband, rs_initialize_lq(priv, conf, sta, lq_sta); } -static void rs_fill_link_cmd(const struct iwl_priv *priv, +static void rs_fill_link_cmd(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta, u32 new_rate) { struct iwl_scale_tbl_info tbl_type; |