summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>2009-09-25 14:24:25 -0700
committerJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>2009-10-07 16:39:36 -0400
commit2b396a120922062a0ffd2648be3ed7e72ff83620 (patch)
treea8278f7989790a439eaacdd691a1c003232f1d8d /drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi
parent9bddbab36d736c181678e07515aaa63045bdcea7 (diff)
iwlwifi: default to using all chains
When instructing the microcode to use just a single chain when we have power saving enabled, we should also tell the AP that we are doing SM powersave. However, using a single chain doesn't actually have any power saving advantage while idle -- measurements show that the power consumption is no different when using one vs. two or three chains. Therefore, always instruct the microcode to use all chains. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c30
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c
index 5ff0f66f8aa..e97b104ba1d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c
@@ -948,8 +948,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(iwl_set_rxon_ht);
#define IWL_NUM_IDLE_CHAINS_DUAL 2
#define IWL_NUM_IDLE_CHAINS_SINGLE 1
-/* Determine how many receiver/antenna chains to use.
- * More provides better reception via diversity. Fewer saves power.
+/*
+ * Determine how many receiver/antenna chains to use.
+ *
+ * More provides better reception via diversity. Fewer saves power
+ * at the expense of throughput, but only when not in powersave to
+ * start with.
+ *
* MIMO (dual stream) requires at least 2, but works better with 3.
* This does not determine *which* chains to use, just how many.
*/
@@ -962,19 +967,18 @@ static int iwl_get_active_rx_chain_count(struct iwl_priv *priv)
return IWL_NUM_RX_CHAINS_MULTIPLE;
}
+/*
+ * When we are in power saving, there's no difference between
+ * using multiple chains or just a single chain, but due to the
+ * lack of SM PS we lose a lot of throughput if we use just a
+ * single chain.
+ *
+ * Therefore, use the active count here (which will use multiple
+ * chains unless connected to a legacy AP).
+ */
static int iwl_get_idle_rx_chain_count(struct iwl_priv *priv, int active_cnt)
{
- bool is_cam = !test_bit(STATUS_POWER_PMI, &priv->status);
-
- /* # Rx chains when idling and maybe trying to save power */
-
- /*
- * XXX: this is incorrect!!
- * we always indicate to the AP that
- * our SM PS mode is "disabled"
- */
-
- return is_cam ? active_cnt : IWL_NUM_IDLE_CHAINS_SINGLE;
+ return active_cnt;
}
/* up to 4 chains */