summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/iwmc3200wifi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>2010-01-14 17:00:54 -0500
committerJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>2010-01-14 17:06:49 -0500
commit79b6a5110abf6fd4454ba34e0960783a4a2c801a (patch)
treef527bc90d11773f916fe411e67d1adec6b690fc1 /drivers/net/wireless/iwmc3200wifi
parenta5fb297d634ba20bd53a7d6fecd611bbfd342e78 (diff)
Revert "iwmc3200wifi: fix array out-of-boundary access"
This reverts commit 6c853da3f30c93eae847ecbcd9fdf10ba0da04c2. From Message-ID: <1262663293.551.117.camel@debian> On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 22:09 +0800, Dan Carpenter wrote: > It don't think 6c853da3f30c93 is right. That's the patch > titled "iwmc3200wifi: fix array out-of-boundary access" > > Allocate priv->rx_packets[IWM_RX_ID_HASH + 1] because the max array > index is IWM_RX_ID_HASH according to IWM_RX_ID_GET_HASH(). > > In 2.6.33-rc2 IWM_RX_ID_GET_HASH() doesn't go as high as IWM_RX_ID_HASH > and I don't see any array out-of-bounds. > > #define IWM_RX_ID_GET_HASH(id) ((id) % IWM_RX_ID_HASH) Ah, you are right. I took '%' for '&'. John, would you revert it? Sorry for the false alarm. Thanks, -yi Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/iwmc3200wifi')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwmc3200wifi/iwm.h2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwmc3200wifi/iwm.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwmc3200wifi/iwm.h
index 842811142be..79ffa3b98d7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwmc3200wifi/iwm.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwmc3200wifi/iwm.h
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ struct iwm_priv {
struct sk_buff_head rx_list;
struct list_head rx_tickets;
- struct list_head rx_packets[IWM_RX_ID_HASH + 1];
+ struct list_head rx_packets[IWM_RX_ID_HASH];
struct workqueue_struct *rx_wq;
struct work_struct rx_worker;