diff options
| author | Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> | 2008-02-05 16:50:48 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> | 2008-02-05 16:51:00 +0100 |
| commit | e35e1fadb4585e3143fab34dd4f5070698b3305b (patch) | |
| tree | a3fffc3c92115fd89e6cb339cf24616c56e55d96 /drivers/s390 | |
| parent | fe6b8e76d920b93fd445382aff7ff24082af8874 (diff) | |
[S390] sclp_tty/sclp_vt220: Fix scheduling while atomic
Under load the following bug message appeared while using sysrq-t:
BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/3662/0x00000004
0000000000105b74 000000003ba17740 0000000000000002 0000000000000000
000000003ba177e0 000000003ba17758 000000003ba17758 0000000000105bfe
0000000000817ba8 000000003f2a5350 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
000000003ba17740 000000000000000c 000000003ba17740 000000003ba177b0
0000000000568630 0000000000105bfe 000000003ba17740 000000003ba17790
Call Trace:
([<0000000000105b74>] show_trace+0x13c/0x158)
[<0000000000105c58>] show_stack+0xc8/0xfc
[<0000000000105cbc>] dump_stack+0x30/0x40
[<000000000012a0c8>] __schedule_bug+0x84/0x94
[<000000000056234e>] schedule+0x5ea/0x970
[<0000000000477cd2>] __sclp_vt220_write+0x1f6/0x3ec
[<0000000000477f00>] sclp_vt220_con_write+0x38/0x48
[<0000000000130b4a>] __call_console_drivers+0xbe/0xd8
[<0000000000130bf0>] _call_console_drivers+0x8c/0xd0
[<0000000000130eea>] release_console_sem+0x1a6/0x2fc
[<0000000000131786>] vprintk+0x262/0x480
[<00000000001319fa>] printk+0x56/0x68
[<0000000000125aaa>] print_cfs_rq+0x45e/0x4a4
[<000000000012614e>] sched_debug_show+0x65e/0xee8
[<000000000012a8fc>] show_state_filter+0x1cc/0x1f0
[<000000000044d39c>] sysrq_handle_showstate+0x2c/0x3c
[<000000000044d1fe>] __handle_sysrq+0xae/0x18c
[<00000000002001f2>] write_sysrq_trigger+0x8a/0x90
[<00000000001f7862>] proc_reg_write+0x9a/0xc4
[<00000000001a83d4>] vfs_write+0xb8/0x174
[<00000000001a8b88>] sys_write+0x58/0x8c
[<0000000000112e7c>] sysc_noemu+0x10/0x16
[<0000020000116f68>] 0x20000116f68
The problem seems to be, that with a full console buffer, release_console_sem
disables interrupts with spin_lock_irqsave and then calls the console function
without enabling interrupts. __sclp_vt220_write checks for in_interrupt, to
decide if it can schedule. It should check for in_atomic instead.
The same is true for sclp_tty.c.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/s390')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/s390/char/sclp_vt220.c | 2 |
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c index e3b3d390b4a..2e616e33891 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c +++ b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ sclp_tty_write_string(const unsigned char *str, int count) if (sclp_ttybuf == NULL) { while (list_empty(&sclp_tty_pages)) { spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sclp_tty_lock, flags); - if (in_interrupt()) + if (in_atomic()) sclp_sync_wait(); else wait_event(sclp_tty_waitq, diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_vt220.c b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_vt220.c index 40cd21bc5cc..68071622d4b 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_vt220.c +++ b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_vt220.c @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ __sclp_vt220_write(const unsigned char *buf, int count, int do_schedule, while (list_empty(&sclp_vt220_empty)) { spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sclp_vt220_lock, flags); - if (in_interrupt()) + if (in_atomic()) sclp_sync_wait(); else wait_event(sclp_vt220_waitq, |