summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>2011-05-10 02:28:48 -0700
committerDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>2011-07-03 04:04:47 -0700
commitc72086e3c2897eaca5b99c005dd9844fdc784981 (patch)
treef15c4895fd0b761b360961bce15b9f07c7099548 /drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
parentf139303d17c47eff4c5b5407dee0a6d43e8fd146 (diff)
isci: merge smp request substates into primary state machine
Remove usage of the request substate machine for smp requests identified by: task->task_proto == SAS_PROTOCOL_SMP While merging over the smp_request infrastructure noticed that all the assign buffer implementations are now equal, so moved it to scic_sds_general_request_construct. Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/scsi/isci/request.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/scsi/isci/request.c462
1 files changed, 422 insertions, 40 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
index 5f516811055..5201dc58a19 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
@@ -158,12 +158,6 @@ void scic_sds_request_build_sgl(struct scic_sds_request *sds_request)
}
}
-static void scic_sds_ssp_io_request_assign_buffers(struct scic_sds_request *sci_req)
-{
- if (sci_req->was_tag_assigned_by_user == false)
- sci_req->task_context_buffer = &sci_req->tc;
-}
-
static void scic_sds_io_request_build_ssp_command_iu(struct scic_sds_request *sci_req)
{
struct ssp_cmd_iu *cmd_iu;
@@ -341,12 +335,6 @@ static void scu_ssp_io_request_construct_task_context(
scic_sds_request_build_sgl(sci_req);
}
-static void scic_sds_ssp_task_request_assign_buffers(struct scic_sds_request *sci_req)
-{
- if (sci_req->was_tag_assigned_by_user == false)
- sci_req->task_context_buffer = &sci_req->tc;
-}
-
/**
* This method will fill in the SCU Task Context for a SSP Task request. The
* following important settings are utilized: -# priority ==
@@ -1261,6 +1249,196 @@ static enum sci_status scic_sds_ssp_task_request_await_tc_response_frame_handler
return SCI_SUCCESS;
}
+/**
+ * This method processes an abnormal TC completion while the SMP request is
+ * waiting for a response frame. It decides what happened to the IO based
+ * on TC completion status.
+ * @sci_req: This parameter specifies the request for which the TC
+ * completion was received.
+ * @completion_code: This parameter indicates the completion status information
+ * for the TC.
+ *
+ * Indicate if the tc completion handler was successful. SCI_SUCCESS currently
+ * this method always returns success.
+ */
+static enum sci_status scic_sds_smp_request_await_response_tc_completion_handler(
+ struct scic_sds_request *sci_req,
+ u32 completion_code)
+{
+ switch (SCU_GET_COMPLETION_TL_STATUS(completion_code)) {
+ case SCU_MAKE_COMPLETION_STATUS(SCU_TASK_DONE_GOOD):
+ /*
+ * In the AWAIT RESPONSE state, any TC completion is unexpected.
+ * but if the TC has success status, we complete the IO anyway. */
+ scic_sds_request_set_status(
+ sci_req, SCU_TASK_DONE_GOOD, SCI_SUCCESS
+ );
+
+ sci_base_state_machine_change_state(
+ &sci_req->state_machine,
+ SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED);
+ break;
+
+ case SCU_MAKE_COMPLETION_STATUS(SCU_TASK_DONE_SMP_RESP_TO_ERR):
+ case SCU_MAKE_COMPLETION_STATUS(SCU_TASK_DONE_SMP_UFI_ERR):
+ case SCU_MAKE_COMPLETION_STATUS(SCU_TASK_DONE_SMP_FRM_TYPE_ERR):
+ case SCU_MAKE_COMPLETION_STATUS(SCU_TASK_DONE_SMP_LL_RX_ERR):
+ /*
+ * These status has been seen in a specific LSI expander, which sometimes
+ * is not able to send smp response within 2 ms. This causes our hardware
+ * break the connection and set TC completion with one of these SMP_XXX_XX_ERR
+ * status. For these type of error, we ask scic user to retry the request. */
+ scic_sds_request_set_status(
+ sci_req, SCU_TASK_DONE_SMP_RESP_TO_ERR, SCI_FAILURE_RETRY_REQUIRED
+ );
+
+ sci_base_state_machine_change_state(
+ &sci_req->state_machine,
+ SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED);
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ /*
+ * All other completion status cause the IO to be complete. If a NAK
+ * was received, then it is up to the user to retry the request. */
+ scic_sds_request_set_status(
+ sci_req,
+ SCU_NORMALIZE_COMPLETION_STATUS(completion_code),
+ SCI_FAILURE_CONTROLLER_SPECIFIC_IO_ERR
+ );
+
+ sci_base_state_machine_change_state(
+ &sci_req->state_machine,
+ SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return SCI_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function processes an unsolicited frame while the SMP request is waiting
+ * for a response frame. It will copy the response data, release the
+ * unsolicited frame, and transition the request to the
+ * SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED state.
+ * @sci_req: This parameter specifies the request for which the
+ * unsolicited frame was received.
+ * @frame_index: This parameter indicates the unsolicited frame index that
+ * should contain the response.
+ *
+ * This function returns an indication of whether the response frame was handled
+ * successfully or not. SCI_SUCCESS Currently this value is always returned and
+ * indicates successful processing of the TC response.
+ */
+static enum sci_status
+scic_sds_smp_request_await_response_frame_handler(struct scic_sds_request *sci_req,
+ u32 frame_index)
+{
+ enum sci_status status;
+ void *frame_header;
+ struct smp_resp *rsp_hdr = &sci_req->smp.rsp;
+ ssize_t word_cnt = SMP_RESP_HDR_SZ / sizeof(u32);
+
+ status = scic_sds_unsolicited_frame_control_get_header(
+ &(scic_sds_request_get_controller(sci_req)->uf_control),
+ frame_index,
+ &frame_header);
+
+ /* byte swap the header. */
+ sci_swab32_cpy(rsp_hdr, frame_header, word_cnt);
+
+ if (rsp_hdr->frame_type == SMP_RESPONSE) {
+ void *smp_resp;
+
+ status = scic_sds_unsolicited_frame_control_get_buffer(
+ &(scic_sds_request_get_controller(sci_req)->uf_control),
+ frame_index,
+ &smp_resp);
+
+ word_cnt = (sizeof(struct smp_req) - SMP_RESP_HDR_SZ) /
+ sizeof(u32);
+
+ sci_swab32_cpy(((u8 *) rsp_hdr) + SMP_RESP_HDR_SZ,
+ smp_resp, word_cnt);
+
+ scic_sds_request_set_status(
+ sci_req, SCU_TASK_DONE_GOOD, SCI_SUCCESS);
+
+ sci_base_state_machine_change_state(&sci_req->state_machine,
+ SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_COMPLETION);
+ } else {
+ /* This was not a response frame why did it get forwarded? */
+ dev_err(scic_to_dev(sci_req->owning_controller),
+ "%s: SCIC SMP Request 0x%p received unexpected frame "
+ "%d type 0x%02x\n",
+ __func__,
+ sci_req,
+ frame_index,
+ rsp_hdr->frame_type);
+
+ scic_sds_request_set_status(
+ sci_req,
+ SCU_TASK_DONE_SMP_FRM_TYPE_ERR,
+ SCI_FAILURE_CONTROLLER_SPECIFIC_IO_ERR);
+
+ sci_base_state_machine_change_state(
+ &sci_req->state_machine,
+ SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED);
+ }
+
+ scic_sds_controller_release_frame(sci_req->owning_controller,
+ frame_index);
+
+ return SCI_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+/**
+ * This method processes the completions transport layer (TL) status to
+ * determine if the SMP request was sent successfully. If the SMP request
+ * was sent successfully, then the state for the SMP request transits to
+ * waiting for a response frame.
+ * @sci_req: This parameter specifies the request for which the TC
+ * completion was received.
+ * @completion_code: This parameter indicates the completion status information
+ * for the TC.
+ *
+ * Indicate if the tc completion handler was successful. SCI_SUCCESS currently
+ * this method always returns success.
+ */
+static enum sci_status scic_sds_smp_request_await_tc_completion_tc_completion_handler(
+ struct scic_sds_request *sci_req,
+ u32 completion_code)
+{
+ switch (SCU_GET_COMPLETION_TL_STATUS(completion_code)) {
+ case SCU_MAKE_COMPLETION_STATUS(SCU_TASK_DONE_GOOD):
+ scic_sds_request_set_status(
+ sci_req, SCU_TASK_DONE_GOOD, SCI_SUCCESS
+ );
+
+ sci_base_state_machine_change_state(
+ &sci_req->state_machine,
+ SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED);
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ /*
+ * All other completion status cause the IO to be complete. If a NAK
+ * was received, then it is up to the user to retry the request. */
+ scic_sds_request_set_status(
+ sci_req,
+ SCU_NORMALIZE_COMPLETION_STATUS(completion_code),
+ SCI_FAILURE_CONTROLLER_SPECIFIC_IO_ERR
+ );
+
+ sci_base_state_machine_change_state(
+ &sci_req->state_machine,
+ SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return SCI_SUCCESS;
+}
+
static const struct scic_sds_io_request_state_handler scic_sds_request_state_handler_table[] = {
[SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_INITIAL] = { },
[SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_CONSTRUCTED] = {
@@ -1280,6 +1458,15 @@ static const struct scic_sds_io_request_state_handler scic_sds_request_state_han
.abort_handler = scic_sds_ssp_task_request_await_tc_response_abort_handler,
.frame_handler = scic_sds_ssp_task_request_await_tc_response_frame_handler,
},
+ [SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_RESPONSE] = {
+ .abort_handler = scic_sds_request_started_state_abort_handler,
+ .tc_completion_handler = scic_sds_smp_request_await_response_tc_completion_handler,
+ .frame_handler = scic_sds_smp_request_await_response_frame_handler,
+ },
+ [SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_COMPLETION] = {
+ .abort_handler = scic_sds_request_started_state_abort_handler,
+ .tc_completion_handler = scic_sds_smp_request_await_tc_completion_tc_completion_handler,
+ },
[SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED] = {
.complete_handler = scic_sds_request_completed_state_complete_handler,
},
@@ -2038,6 +2225,12 @@ static void scic_sds_request_started_state_enter(void *object)
struct sci_base_state_machine *sm = &sci_req->state_machine;
struct isci_request *ireq = sci_req_to_ireq(sci_req);
struct domain_device *dev = sci_dev_to_domain(sci_req->target_device);
+ struct sas_task *task;
+
+ /* XXX as hch said always creating an internal sas_task for tmf
+ * requests would simplify the driver
+ */
+ task = ireq->ttype == io_task ? isci_request_access_task(ireq) : NULL;
SET_STATE_HANDLER(
sci_req,
@@ -2045,15 +2238,19 @@ static void scic_sds_request_started_state_enter(void *object)
SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_STARTED
);
- if (ireq->ttype == tmf_task && dev->dev_type == SAS_END_DEV)
- sci_base_state_machine_change_state(sm,
- SCIC_SDS_IO_REQUEST_STARTED_TASK_MGMT_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_COMPLETION);
-
/* Most of the request state machines have a started substate machine so
* start its execution on the entry to the started state.
*/
if (sci_req->has_started_substate_machine == true)
sci_base_state_machine_start(&sci_req->started_substate_machine);
+
+ if (!task && dev->dev_type == SAS_END_DEV) {
+ sci_base_state_machine_change_state(sm,
+ SCIC_SDS_IO_REQUEST_STARTED_TASK_MGMT_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_COMPLETION);
+ } else if (task && task->task_proto == SAS_PROTOCOL_SMP) {
+ sci_base_state_machine_change_state(sm,
+ SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_RESPONSE);
+ }
}
/**
@@ -2173,6 +2370,28 @@ static void scic_sds_io_request_started_task_mgmt_await_task_response_substate_e
);
}
+static void scic_sds_smp_request_started_await_response_substate_enter(void *object)
+{
+ struct scic_sds_request *sci_req = object;
+
+ SET_STATE_HANDLER(
+ sci_req,
+ scic_sds_request_state_handler_table,
+ SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_RESPONSE
+ );
+}
+
+static void scic_sds_smp_request_started_await_tc_completion_substate_enter(void *object)
+{
+ struct scic_sds_request *sci_req = object;
+
+ SET_STATE_HANDLER(
+ sci_req,
+ scic_sds_request_state_handler_table,
+ SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_COMPLETION
+ );
+}
+
static const struct sci_base_state scic_sds_request_state_table[] = {
[SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_INITIAL] = {
.enter_state = scic_sds_request_initial_state_enter,
@@ -2190,6 +2409,12 @@ static const struct sci_base_state scic_sds_request_state_table[] = {
[SCIC_SDS_IO_REQUEST_STARTED_TASK_MGMT_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_RESPONSE] = {
.enter_state = scic_sds_io_request_started_task_mgmt_await_task_response_substate_enter,
},
+ [SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_RESPONSE] = {
+ .enter_state = scic_sds_smp_request_started_await_response_substate_enter,
+ },
+ [SCIC_SDS_SMP_REQUEST_STARTED_SUBSTATE_AWAIT_TC_COMPLETION] = {
+ .enter_state = scic_sds_smp_request_started_await_tc_completion_substate_enter,
+ },
[SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED] = {
.enter_state = scic_sds_request_completed_state_enter,
},
@@ -2225,7 +2450,7 @@ static void scic_sds_general_request_construct(struct scic_sds_controller *scic,
if (io_tag == SCI_CONTROLLER_INVALID_IO_TAG) {
sci_req->was_tag_assigned_by_user = false;
- sci_req->task_context_buffer = NULL;
+ sci_req->task_context_buffer = &sci_req->tc;
} else {
sci_req->was_tag_assigned_by_user = true;
@@ -2245,26 +2470,20 @@ scic_io_request_construct(struct scic_sds_controller *scic,
/* Build the common part of the request */
scic_sds_general_request_construct(scic, sci_dev, io_tag, sci_req);
- if (sci_dev->rnc.remote_node_index ==
- SCIC_SDS_REMOTE_NODE_CONTEXT_INVALID_INDEX)
+ if (sci_dev->rnc.remote_node_index == SCIC_SDS_REMOTE_NODE_CONTEXT_INVALID_INDEX)
return SCI_FAILURE_INVALID_REMOTE_DEVICE;
if (dev->dev_type == SAS_END_DEV)
- scic_sds_ssp_io_request_assign_buffers(sci_req);
- else if ((dev->dev_type == SATA_DEV) ||
- (dev->tproto & SAS_PROTOCOL_STP)) {
- scic_sds_stp_request_assign_buffers(sci_req);
+ /* pass */;
+ else if (dev->dev_type == SATA_DEV || (dev->tproto & SAS_PROTOCOL_STP))
memset(&sci_req->stp.cmd, 0, sizeof(sci_req->stp.cmd));
- } else if (dev_is_expander(dev)) {
- scic_sds_smp_request_assign_buffers(sci_req);
+ else if (dev_is_expander(dev))
memset(&sci_req->smp.cmd, 0, sizeof(sci_req->smp.cmd));
- } else
- status = SCI_FAILURE_UNSUPPORTED_PROTOCOL;
+ else
+ return SCI_FAILURE_UNSUPPORTED_PROTOCOL;
- if (status == SCI_SUCCESS) {
- memset(sci_req->task_context_buffer, 0,
- offsetof(struct scu_task_context, sgl_pair_ab));
- }
+ memset(sci_req->task_context_buffer, 0,
+ offsetof(struct scu_task_context, sgl_pair_ab));
return status;
}
@@ -2279,17 +2498,12 @@ enum sci_status scic_task_request_construct(struct scic_sds_controller *scic,
/* Build the common part of the request */
scic_sds_general_request_construct(scic, sci_dev, io_tag, sci_req);
- if (dev->dev_type == SAS_END_DEV)
- scic_sds_ssp_task_request_assign_buffers(sci_req);
- else if (dev->dev_type == SATA_DEV || (dev->tproto & SAS_PROTOCOL_STP))
- scic_sds_stp_request_assign_buffers(sci_req);
- else
- status = SCI_FAILURE_UNSUPPORTED_PROTOCOL;
-
- if (status == SCI_SUCCESS) {
+ if (dev->dev_type == SAS_END_DEV ||
+ dev->dev_type == SATA_DEV || (dev->tproto & SAS_PROTOCOL_STP)) {
sci_req->is_task_management_request = true;
memset(sci_req->task_context_buffer, 0, sizeof(struct scu_task_context));
- }
+ } else
+ status = SCI_FAILURE_UNSUPPORTED_PROTOCOL;
return status;
}
@@ -2341,6 +2555,174 @@ static enum sci_status isci_request_stp_request_construct(
}
/*
+ * This function will fill in the SCU Task Context for a SMP request. The
+ * following important settings are utilized: -# task_type ==
+ * SCU_TASK_TYPE_SMP. This simply indicates that a normal request type
+ * (i.e. non-raw frame) is being utilized to perform task management. -#
+ * control_frame == 1. This ensures that the proper endianess is set so
+ * that the bytes are transmitted in the right order for a smp request frame.
+ * @sci_req: This parameter specifies the smp request object being
+ * constructed.
+ *
+ */
+static void
+scu_smp_request_construct_task_context(struct scic_sds_request *sci_req,
+ struct smp_req *smp_req)
+{
+ dma_addr_t dma_addr;
+ struct scic_sds_controller *scic;
+ struct scic_sds_remote_device *sci_dev;
+ struct scic_sds_port *sci_port;
+ struct scu_task_context *task_context;
+ ssize_t word_cnt = sizeof(struct smp_req) / sizeof(u32);
+
+ /* byte swap the smp request. */
+ sci_swab32_cpy(&sci_req->smp.cmd, smp_req,
+ word_cnt);
+
+ task_context = scic_sds_request_get_task_context(sci_req);
+
+ scic = scic_sds_request_get_controller(sci_req);
+ sci_dev = scic_sds_request_get_device(sci_req);
+ sci_port = scic_sds_request_get_port(sci_req);
+
+ /*
+ * Fill in the TC with the its required data
+ * 00h
+ */
+ task_context->priority = 0;
+ task_context->initiator_request = 1;
+ task_context->connection_rate = sci_dev->connection_rate;
+ task_context->protocol_engine_index =
+ scic_sds_controller_get_protocol_engine_group(scic);
+ task_context->logical_port_index = scic_sds_port_get_index(sci_port);
+ task_context->protocol_type = SCU_TASK_CONTEXT_PROTOCOL_SMP;
+ task_context->abort = 0;
+ task_context->valid = SCU_TASK_CONTEXT_VALID;
+ task_context->context_type = SCU_TASK_CONTEXT_TYPE;
+
+ /* 04h */
+ task_context->remote_node_index = sci_dev->rnc.remote_node_index;
+ task_context->command_code = 0;
+ task_context->task_type = SCU_TASK_TYPE_SMP_REQUEST;
+
+ /* 08h */
+ task_context->link_layer_control = 0;
+ task_context->do_not_dma_ssp_good_response = 1;
+ task_context->strict_ordering = 0;
+ task_context->control_frame = 1;
+ task_context->timeout_enable = 0;
+ task_context->block_guard_enable = 0;
+
+ /* 0ch */
+ task_context->address_modifier = 0;
+
+ /* 10h */
+ task_context->ssp_command_iu_length = smp_req->req_len;
+
+ /* 14h */
+ task_context->transfer_length_bytes = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * 18h ~ 30h, protocol specific
+ * since commandIU has been build by framework at this point, we just
+ * copy the frist DWord from command IU to this location. */
+ memcpy(&task_context->type.smp, &sci_req->smp.cmd, sizeof(u32));
+
+ /*
+ * 40h
+ * "For SMP you could program it to zero. We would prefer that way
+ * so that done code will be consistent." - Venki
+ */
+ task_context->task_phase = 0;
+
+ if (sci_req->was_tag_assigned_by_user) {
+ /*
+ * Build the task context now since we have already read
+ * the data
+ */
+ sci_req->post_context =
+ (SCU_CONTEXT_COMMAND_REQUEST_TYPE_POST_TC |
+ (scic_sds_controller_get_protocol_engine_group(scic) <<
+ SCU_CONTEXT_COMMAND_PROTOCOL_ENGINE_GROUP_SHIFT) |
+ (scic_sds_port_get_index(sci_port) <<
+ SCU_CONTEXT_COMMAND_LOGICAL_PORT_SHIFT) |
+ scic_sds_io_tag_get_index(sci_req->io_tag));
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Build the task context now since we have already read
+ * the data.
+ * I/O tag index is not assigned because we have to wait
+ * until we get a TCi.
+ */
+ sci_req->post_context =
+ (SCU_CONTEXT_COMMAND_REQUEST_TYPE_POST_TC |
+ (scic_sds_controller_get_protocol_engine_group(scic) <<
+ SCU_CONTEXT_COMMAND_PROTOCOL_ENGINE_GROUP_SHIFT) |
+ (scic_sds_port_get_index(sci_port) <<
+ SCU_CONTEXT_COMMAND_LOGICAL_PORT_SHIFT));
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Copy the physical address for the command buffer to the SCU Task
+ * Context command buffer should not contain command header.
+ */
+ dma_addr = scic_io_request_get_dma_addr(sci_req,
+ ((char *) &sci_req->smp.cmd) +
+ sizeof(u32));
+
+ task_context->command_iu_upper = upper_32_bits(dma_addr);
+ task_context->command_iu_lower = lower_32_bits(dma_addr);
+
+ /* SMP response comes as UF, so no need to set response IU address. */
+ task_context->response_iu_upper = 0;
+ task_context->response_iu_lower = 0;
+}
+
+static enum sci_status scic_io_request_construct_smp(struct scic_sds_request *sci_req)
+{
+ struct smp_req *smp_req = kmalloc(sizeof(*smp_req), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ if (!smp_req)
+ return SCI_FAILURE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES;
+
+ sci_req->protocol = SCIC_SMP_PROTOCOL;
+
+ /* Construct the SMP SCU Task Context */
+ memcpy(smp_req, &sci_req->smp.cmd, sizeof(*smp_req));
+
+ /*
+ * Look at the SMP requests' header fields; for certain SAS 1.x SMP
+ * functions under SAS 2.0, a zero request length really indicates
+ * a non-zero default length. */
+ if (smp_req->req_len == 0) {
+ switch (smp_req->func) {
+ case SMP_DISCOVER:
+ case SMP_REPORT_PHY_ERR_LOG:
+ case SMP_REPORT_PHY_SATA:
+ case SMP_REPORT_ROUTE_INFO:
+ smp_req->req_len = 2;
+ break;
+ case SMP_CONF_ROUTE_INFO:
+ case SMP_PHY_CONTROL:
+ case SMP_PHY_TEST_FUNCTION:
+ smp_req->req_len = 9;
+ break;
+ /* Default - zero is a valid default for 2.0. */
+ }
+ }
+
+ scu_smp_request_construct_task_context(sci_req, smp_req);
+
+ sci_base_state_machine_change_state(&sci_req->state_machine,
+ SCI_BASE_REQUEST_STATE_CONSTRUCTED);
+
+ kfree(smp_req);
+
+ return SCI_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+/*
* isci_smp_request_build() - This function builds the smp request.
* @ireq: This parameter points to the isci_request allocated in the
* request construct function.