diff options
| author | Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> | 2012-02-15 11:48:34 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com> | 2012-03-27 00:36:40 +0100 |
| commit | 342d3a93e2b191b0ada07ba7c48380181c9214e8 (patch) | |
| tree | 300816865f5d73a345813f4095647c920a6f3b50 /drivers | |
| parent | 492b8bde2c2badd3e5845f2e8de6fa9065438743 (diff) | |
mtd: fix 'Flash device refused suspend due to active operation' message
While debugging on SA11x0, the following message was observed:
"Flash device refused suspend due to active operation (state 20)"
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c index 2d9669047ed..920b474a561 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c @@ -2479,7 +2479,7 @@ static int cfi_intelext_suspend(struct mtd_info *mtd) allowed to. Or should we return -EAGAIN, because the upper layers ought to have already shut down anything which was using the device anyway? The latter for now. */ - printk(KERN_NOTICE "Flash device refused suspend due to active operation (state %d)\n", chip->oldstate); + printk(KERN_NOTICE "Flash device refused suspend due to active operation (state %d)\n", chip->state); ret = -EAGAIN; case FL_PM_SUSPENDED: break; |