diff options
author | David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> | 2012-07-04 12:06:16 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2012-07-09 00:12:42 -0700 |
commit | b93984c9afacd4fe32b785d52a93660d91202b10 (patch) | |
tree | bb140d9abc23831e0771940febdd4392aeffe689 /fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c | |
parent | d4e41649434cd6db2e69783130cba81886dac97f (diff) |
netdev/phy: Fixup lockdep warnings in mdio-mux.c
With lockdep enabled we get:
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.4.4-Cavium-Octeon+ #313 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
kworker/u:1/36 is trying to acquire lock:
(&bus->mdio_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff813da7e8>] mdio_mux_read+0x38/0xa0
but task is already holding lock:
(&bus->mdio_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff813d79e4>] mdiobus_read+0x44/0x88
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&bus->mdio_lock);
lock(&bus->mdio_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
.
.
.
This is a false positive, since we are indeed using 'nested' locking,
we need to use mutex_lock_nested().
Now in theory we can stack multiple MDIO multiplexers, but that would
require passing the nesting level (which is difficult to know) to
mutex_lock_nested(). Instead we assume the simple case of a single
level of nesting. Since these are only warning messages, it isn't so
important to solve the general case.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions