diff options
| author | Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> | 2013-08-29 16:43:28 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> | 2013-09-01 08:16:40 -0400 |
| commit | 7f4f6e0a3f6db9c214de38c792c483b8076bcd6a (patch) | |
| tree | aaf7daed23b75d8c5400cee9cc39f12db134a7b3 /fs/btrfs | |
| parent | f45388f3874535062526ec071284d836f5a4b5de (diff) | |
Btrfs: only update disk_i_size as we remove extents
This fixes a problem where if we fail a truncate we will leave the i_size set
where we wanted to truncate to instead of where we were able to truncate to.
Fix this by making btrfs_truncate_inode_items do the disk_i_size update as it
removes extents, that way it will always be consistent with where its extents
are. Then if the truncate fails at all we can update the in-ram i_size with
what we have on disk and delete the orphan item. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/inode.c | 31 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index f0e41b84073..6091ba9d249 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -3861,6 +3861,7 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 extent_num_bytes = 0; u64 extent_offset = 0; u64 item_end = 0; + u64 last_size = (u64)-1; u32 found_type = (u8)-1; int found_extent; int del_item; @@ -3958,6 +3959,11 @@ search_again: if (found_type != BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY) goto delete; + if (del_item) + last_size = found_key.offset; + else + last_size = new_size; + if (extent_type != BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) { u64 num_dec; extent_start = btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(leaf, fi); @@ -4069,6 +4075,8 @@ out: btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret); } error: + if (last_size != (u64)-1) + btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, last_size, NULL); btrfs_free_path(path); return err; } @@ -4397,8 +4405,26 @@ static int btrfs_setsize(struct inode *inode, struct iattr *attr) btrfs_inode_resume_unlocked_dio(inode); ret = btrfs_truncate(inode); - if (ret && inode->i_nlink) - btrfs_orphan_del(NULL, inode); + if (ret && inode->i_nlink) { + int err; + + /* + * failed to truncate, disk_i_size is only adjusted down + * as we remove extents, so it should represent the true + * size of the inode, so reset the in memory size and + * delete our orphan entry. + */ + trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root); + if (IS_ERR(trans)) { + btrfs_orphan_del(NULL, inode); + return ret; + } + i_size_write(inode, BTRFS_I(inode)->disk_i_size); + err = btrfs_orphan_del(trans, inode); + if (err) + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, err); + btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root); + } } return ret; @@ -7537,7 +7563,6 @@ static int btrfs_truncate(struct inode *inode) u64 min_size = btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size(root, 1); btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, inode->i_size & (~mask), (u64)-1); - btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, inode->i_size, NULL); /* * Yes ladies and gentelment, this is indeed ugly. The fact is we have |