Merge commit 'v2.6.31-rc9' into tracing/core

Merge reason: move from -rc5 to -rc9.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/fs/ext3/Kconfig b/fs/ext3/Kconfig
index fb3c1a21b13..522b15498f4 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/ext3/Kconfig
@@ -29,23 +29,25 @@ config EXT3_FS
 	  module will be called ext3.
 
 config EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED
-	bool "Default to 'data=ordered' in ext3 (legacy option)"
+	bool "Default to 'data=ordered' in ext3"
 	depends on EXT3_FS
 	help
-	  If a filesystem does not explicitly specify a data ordering
-	  mode, and the journal capability allowed it, ext3 used to
-	  historically default to 'data=ordered'.
-
-	  That was a rather unfortunate choice, because it leads to all
-	  kinds of latency problems, and the 'data=writeback' mode is more
-	  appropriate these days.
-
-	  You should probably always answer 'n' here, and if you really
-	  want to use 'data=ordered' mode, set it in the filesystem itself
-	  with 'tune2fs -o journal_data_ordered'.
-
-	  But if you really want to enable the legacy default, you can do
-	  so by answering 'y' to this question.
+	  The journal mode options for ext3 have different tradeoffs
+	  between when data is guaranteed to be on disk and
+	  performance.	The use of "data=writeback" can cause
+	  unwritten data to appear in files after an system crash or
+	  power failure, which can be a security issue.	 However,
+	  "data=ordered" mode can also result in major performance
+	  problems, including seconds-long delays before an fsync()
+	  call returns.	 For details, see:
+
+	  http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext3_data_mode_tradeoffs
+
+	  If you have been historically happy with ext3's performance,
+	  data=ordered mode will be a safe choice and you should
+	  answer 'y' here.  If you understand the reliability and data
+	  privacy issues of data=writeback and are willing to make
+	  that trade off, answer 'n'.
 
 config EXT3_FS_XATTR
 	bool "Ext3 extended attributes"