asm-generic: merge branch 'master' of torvalds/linux-2.6

Fixes a merge conflict against the x86 tree caused by a fix to
atomic.h which I renamed to atomic_long.h.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
index 22098e1cd08..07eb6649e4f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@
 #include "ext4.h"
 #include "ext4_jbd2.h"
 
-#include "namei.h"
 #include "xattr.h"
 #include "acl.h"
 
@@ -750,7 +749,7 @@ static int dx_make_map(struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de, unsigned blocksize,
 			ext4fs_dirhash(de->name, de->name_len, &h);
 			map_tail--;
 			map_tail->hash = h.hash;
-			map_tail->offs = (u16) ((char *) de - base);
+			map_tail->offs = ((char *) de - base)>>2;
 			map_tail->size = le16_to_cpu(de->rec_len);
 			count++;
 			cond_resched();
@@ -1148,7 +1147,8 @@ dx_move_dirents(char *from, char *to, struct dx_map_entry *map, int count,
 	unsigned rec_len = 0;
 
 	while (count--) {
-		struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de = (struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *) (from + map->offs);
+		struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de = (struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *) 
+						(from + (map->offs<<2));
 		rec_len = EXT4_DIR_REC_LEN(de->name_len);
 		memcpy (to, de, rec_len);
 		((struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *) to)->rec_len =
@@ -1997,7 +1997,7 @@ int ext4_orphan_add(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
 	if (!ext4_handle_valid(handle))
 		return 0;
 
-	lock_super(sb);
+	mutex_lock(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_orphan_lock);
 	if (!list_empty(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
@@ -2006,9 +2006,13 @@ int ext4_orphan_add(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
 
 	/* @@@ FIXME: Observation from aviro:
 	 * I think I can trigger J_ASSERT in ext4_orphan_add().  We block
-	 * here (on lock_super()), so race with ext4_link() which might bump
+	 * here (on s_orphan_lock), so race with ext4_link() which might bump
 	 * ->i_nlink. For, say it, character device. Not a regular file,
 	 * not a directory, not a symlink and ->i_nlink > 0.
+	 *
+	 * tytso, 4/25/2009: I'm not sure how that could happen;
+	 * shouldn't the fs core protect us from these sort of
+	 * unlink()/link() races?
 	 */
 	J_ASSERT((S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
 		  S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)) || inode->i_nlink == 0);
@@ -2045,7 +2049,7 @@ int ext4_orphan_add(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
 	jbd_debug(4, "orphan inode %lu will point to %d\n",
 			inode->i_ino, NEXT_ORPHAN(inode));
 out_unlock:
-	unlock_super(sb);
+	mutex_unlock(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_orphan_lock);
 	ext4_std_error(inode->i_sb, err);
 	return err;
 }
@@ -2066,11 +2070,9 @@ int ext4_orphan_del(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
 	if (!ext4_handle_valid(handle))
 		return 0;
 
-	lock_super(inode->i_sb);
-	if (list_empty(&ei->i_orphan)) {
-		unlock_super(inode->i_sb);
-		return 0;
-	}
+	mutex_lock(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_orphan_lock);
+	if (list_empty(&ei->i_orphan))
+		goto out;
 
 	ino_next = NEXT_ORPHAN(inode);
 	prev = ei->i_orphan.prev;
@@ -2120,7 +2122,7 @@ int ext4_orphan_del(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
 out_err:
 	ext4_std_error(inode->i_sb, err);
 out:
-	unlock_super(inode->i_sb);
+	mutex_unlock(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_orphan_lock);
 	return err;
 
 out_brelse:
@@ -2533,6 +2535,7 @@ const struct inode_operations ext4_dir_inode_operations = {
 	.removexattr	= generic_removexattr,
 #endif
 	.permission	= ext4_permission,
+	.fiemap         = ext4_fiemap,
 };
 
 const struct inode_operations ext4_special_inode_operations = {