ext4: serialize unaligned asynchronous DIO

ext4 has a data corruption case when doing non-block-aligned
asynchronous direct IO into a sparse file, as demonstrated
by xfstest 240.

The root cause is that while ext4 preallocates space in the
hole, mappings of that space still look "new" and 
dio_zero_block() will zero out the unwritten portions.  When
more than one AIO thread is going, they both find this "new"
block and race to zero out their portion; this is uncoordinated
and causes data corruption.

Dave Chinner fixed this for xfs by simply serializing all
unaligned asynchronous direct IO.  I've done the same here.
The difference is that we only wait on conversions, not all IO.
This is a very big hammer, and I'm not very pleased with
stuffing this into ext4_file_write().  But since ext4 is
DIO_LOCKING, we need to serialize it at this high level.

I tried to move this into ext4_ext_direct_IO, but by then
we have the i_mutex already, and we will wait on the
work queue to do conversions - which must also take the
i_mutex.  So that won't work.

This was originally exposed by qemu-kvm installing to
a raw disk image with a normal sector-63 alignment.  I've
tested a backport of this patch with qemu, and it does
avoid the corruption.  It is also quite a lot slower
(14 min for package installs, vs. 8 min for well-aligned)
but I'll take slow correctness over fast corruption any day.

Mingming suggested that we can track outstanding
conversions, and wait on those so that non-sparse
files won't be affected, and I've implemented that here;
unaligned AIO to nonsparse files won't take a perf hit.

[tytso@mit.edu: Keep the mutex as a hashed array instead
 of bloating the ext4 inode]

[tytso@mit.edu: Fix up namespace issues so that global
 variables are protected with an "ext4_" prefix.]

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
index 4e9b0a242f4..955cc309142 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
@@ -32,14 +32,8 @@
 
 static struct kmem_cache *io_page_cachep, *io_end_cachep;
 
-#define WQ_HASH_SZ		37
-#define to_ioend_wq(v)	(&ioend_wq[((unsigned long)v) % WQ_HASH_SZ])
-static wait_queue_head_t ioend_wq[WQ_HASH_SZ];
-
 int __init ext4_init_pageio(void)
 {
-	int i;
-
 	io_page_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(ext4_io_page, SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT);
 	if (io_page_cachep == NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -48,9 +42,6 @@ int __init ext4_init_pageio(void)
 		kmem_cache_destroy(io_page_cachep);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
-	for (i = 0; i < WQ_HASH_SZ; i++)
-		init_waitqueue_head(&ioend_wq[i]);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -62,7 +53,7 @@ void ext4_exit_pageio(void)
 
 void ext4_ioend_wait(struct inode *inode)
 {
-	wait_queue_head_t *wq = to_ioend_wq(inode);
+	wait_queue_head_t *wq = ext4_ioend_wq(inode);
 
 	wait_event(*wq, (atomic_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_ioend_count) == 0));
 }
@@ -87,7 +78,7 @@ void ext4_free_io_end(ext4_io_end_t *io)
 	for (i = 0; i < io->num_io_pages; i++)
 		put_io_page(io->pages[i]);
 	io->num_io_pages = 0;
-	wq = to_ioend_wq(io->inode);
+	wq = ext4_ioend_wq(io->inode);
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&EXT4_I(io->inode)->i_ioend_count) &&
 	    waitqueue_active(wq))
 		wake_up_all(wq);
@@ -102,6 +93,7 @@ int ext4_end_io_nolock(ext4_io_end_t *io)
 	struct inode *inode = io->inode;
 	loff_t offset = io->offset;
 	ssize_t size = io->size;
+	wait_queue_head_t *wq;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	ext4_debug("ext4_end_io_nolock: io 0x%p from inode %lu,list->next 0x%p,"
@@ -126,7 +118,16 @@ int ext4_end_io_nolock(ext4_io_end_t *io)
 	if (io->iocb)
 		aio_complete(io->iocb, io->result, 0);
 	/* clear the DIO AIO unwritten flag */
-	io->flag &= ~EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
+	if (io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN) {
+		io->flag &= ~EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
+		/* Wake up anyone waiting on unwritten extent conversion */
+		wq = ext4_ioend_wq(io->inode);
+		if (atomic_dec_and_test(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten) &&
+		    waitqueue_active(wq)) {
+			wake_up_all(wq);
+		}
+	}
+
 	return ret;
 }