diff options
| author | Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> | 2013-07-02 22:38:35 +1000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2013-07-02 09:16:42 -0700 |
| commit | 7747bd4bceb3079572695d3942294a6c7b265557 (patch) | |
| tree | 7d6ecbf886ddcb4a102e3b501ee02ea82b3719c2 /fs/fs-writeback.c | |
| parent | 8bb495e3f02401ee6f76d1b1d77f3ac9f079e376 (diff) | |
sync: don't block the flusher thread waiting on IO
When sync does it's WB_SYNC_ALL writeback, it issues data Io and
then immediately waits for IO completion. This is done in the
context of the flusher thread, and hence completely ties up the
flusher thread for the backing device until all the dirty inodes
have been synced. On filesystems that are dirtying inodes constantly
and quickly, this means the flusher thread can be tied up for
minutes per sync call and hence badly affect system level write IO
performance as the page cache cannot be cleaned quickly.
We already have a wait loop for IO completion for sync(2), so cut
this out of the flusher thread and delegate it to wait_sb_inodes().
Hence we can do rapid IO submission, and then wait for it all to
complete.
Effect of sync on fsmark before the patch:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
.....
0 640000 4096 35154.6 1026984
0 720000 4096 36740.3 1023844
0 800000 4096 36184.6 916599
0 880000 4096 1282.7 1054367
0 960000 4096 3951.3 918773
0 1040000 4096 40646.2 996448
0 1120000 4096 43610.1 895647
0 1200000 4096 40333.1 921048
And a single sync pass took:
real 0m52.407s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.090s
After the patch, there is no impact on fsmark results, and each
individual sync(2) operation run concurrently with the same fsmark
workload takes roughly 7s:
real 0m6.930s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.039s
IOWs, sync is 7-8x faster on a busy filesystem and does not have an
adverse impact on ongoing async data write operations.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/fs-writeback.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/fs-writeback.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index 3be57189efd..a85ac4e3343 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct wb_writeback_work { unsigned int for_kupdate:1; unsigned int range_cyclic:1; unsigned int for_background:1; + unsigned int for_sync:1; /* sync(2) WB_SYNC_ALL writeback */ enum wb_reason reason; /* why was writeback initiated? */ struct list_head list; /* pending work list */ @@ -443,9 +444,11 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc) /* * Make sure to wait on the data before writing out the metadata. * This is important for filesystems that modify metadata on data - * I/O completion. + * I/O completion. We don't do it for sync(2) writeback because it has a + * separate, external IO completion path and ->sync_fs for guaranteeing + * inode metadata is written back correctly. */ - if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL) { + if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL && !wbc->for_sync) { int err = filemap_fdatawait(mapping); if (ret == 0) ret = err; @@ -578,6 +581,7 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, .tagged_writepages = work->tagged_writepages, .for_kupdate = work->for_kupdate, .for_background = work->for_background, + .for_sync = work->for_sync, .range_cyclic = work->range_cyclic, .range_start = 0, .range_end = LLONG_MAX, @@ -1362,6 +1366,7 @@ void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb) .range_cyclic = 0, .done = &done, .reason = WB_REASON_SYNC, + .for_sync = 1, }; /* Nothing to do? */ |