fuse: implement NFS-like readdirplus support

This patch implements readdirplus support in FUSE, similar to NFS.
The payload returned in the readdirplus call contains
'fuse_entry_out' structure thereby providing all the necessary inputs
for 'faking' a lookup() operation on the spot.

If the dentry and inode already existed (for e.g. in a re-run of ls -l)
then just the inode attributes timeout and dentry timeout are refreshed.

With a simple client->network->server implementation of a FUSE based
filesystem, the following performance observations were made:

Test: Performing a filesystem crawl over 20,000 files with

sh# time ls -lR /mnt

Without readdirplus:
Run 1: 18.1s
Run 2: 16.0s
Run 3: 16.2s

With readdirplus:
Run 1: 4.1s
Run 2: 3.8s
Run 3: 3.8s

The performance improvement is significant as it avoided 20,000 upcalls
calls (lookup). Cache consistency is no worse than what already is.

Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati <avati@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
index e105a53fc72..5c5055306d3 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
+++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
@@ -487,6 +487,9 @@ struct fuse_conn {
 	/** Use enhanced/automatic page cache invalidation. */
 	unsigned auto_inval_data:1;
 
+	/** Does the filesystem support readdir-plus? */
+	unsigned do_readdirplus:1;
+
 	/** The number of requests waiting for completion */
 	atomic_t num_waiting;
 
@@ -578,6 +581,9 @@ void fuse_queue_forget(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_forget_link *forget,
 
 struct fuse_forget_link *fuse_alloc_forget(void);
 
+/* Used by READDIRPLUS */
+void fuse_force_forget(struct file *file, u64 nodeid);
+
 /**
  * Initialize READ or READDIR request
  */