[XFS] Radix tree based inode caching

One of the perpetual scaling problems XFS has is indexing it's incore
inodes. We currently uses hashes and the default hash sizes chosen can
only ever be a tradeoff between memory consumption and the maximum
realistic size of the cache.

As a result, anyone who has millions of inodes cached on a filesystem
needs to tunes the size of the cache via the ihashsize mount option to
allow decent scalability with inode cache operations.

A further problem is the separate inode cluster hash, whose size is based
on the ihashsize but is smaller, and so under certain conditions (sparse
cluster cache population) this can become a limitation long before the
inode hash is causing issues.

The following patchset removes the inode hash and cluster hash and
replaces them with radix trees to avoid the scalability limitations of the
hashes. It also reduces the size of the inodes by 3 pointers....

SGI-PV: 969561
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:29481a

Signed-off-by: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 23 deletions

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index 41a0c73b601..c1b917bd595 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
 
 kmem_zone_t *xfs_ifork_zone;
 kmem_zone_t *xfs_inode_zone;
-kmem_zone_t *xfs_chashlist_zone;
+kmem_zone_t *xfs_icluster_zone;
 
 /*
  * Used in xfs_itruncate().  This is the maximum number of extents
@@ -2182,10 +2182,10 @@ xfs_ifree_cluster(
 	int			i, j, found, pre_flushed;
 	xfs_daddr_t		blkno;
 	xfs_buf_t		*bp;
-	xfs_ihash_t		*ih;
 	xfs_inode_t		*ip, **ip_found;
 	xfs_inode_log_item_t	*iip;
 	xfs_log_item_t		*lip;
+	xfs_perag_t		*pag = xfs_get_perag(mp, inum);
 	SPLDECL(s);
 
 	if (mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize >= XFS_INODE_CLUSTER_SIZE(mp)) {
@@ -2220,23 +2220,20 @@ xfs_ifree_cluster(
 		 */
 		found = 0;
 		for (i = 0; i < ninodes; i++) {
-			ih = XFS_IHASH(mp, inum + i);
-			read_lock(&ih->ih_lock);
-			for (ip = ih->ih_next; ip != NULL; ip = ip->i_next) {
-				if (ip->i_ino == inum + i)
-					break;
-			}
+			read_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+			ip = radix_tree_lookup(&pag->pag_ici_root,
+					XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, (inum + i)));
 
 			/* Inode not in memory or we found it already,
 			 * nothing to do
 			 */
 			if (!ip || xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_ISTALE)) {
-				read_unlock(&ih->ih_lock);
+				read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
 				continue;
 			}
 
 			if (xfs_inode_clean(ip)) {
-				read_unlock(&ih->ih_lock);
+				read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
 				continue;
 			}
 
@@ -2259,7 +2256,7 @@ xfs_ifree_cluster(
 						ip_found[found++] = ip;
 					}
 				}
-				read_unlock(&ih->ih_lock);
+				read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
 				continue;
 			}
 
@@ -2277,8 +2274,7 @@ xfs_ifree_cluster(
 					xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
 				}
 			}
-
-			read_unlock(&ih->ih_lock);
+			read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
 		}
 
 		bp = xfs_trans_get_buf(tp, mp->m_ddev_targp, blkno, 
@@ -2333,6 +2329,7 @@ xfs_ifree_cluster(
 	}
 
 	kmem_free(ip_found, ninodes * sizeof(xfs_inode_t *));
+	xfs_put_perag(mp, pag);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3050,12 +3047,11 @@ xfs_iflush(
 	xfs_mount_t		*mp;
 	int			error;
 	/* REFERENCED */
-	xfs_chash_t		*ch;
 	xfs_inode_t		*iq;
 	int			clcount;	/* count of inodes clustered */
 	int			bufwasdelwri;
+	struct hlist_node	*entry;
 	enum { INT_DELWRI = (1 << 0), INT_ASYNC = (1 << 1) };
-	SPLDECL(s);
 
 	XFS_STATS_INC(xs_iflush_count);
 
@@ -3169,14 +3165,14 @@ xfs_iflush(
 	 * inode clustering:
 	 * see if other inodes can be gathered into this write
 	 */
-
-	ip->i_chash->chl_buf = bp;
-
-	ch = XFS_CHASH(mp, ip->i_blkno);
-	s = mutex_spinlock(&ch->ch_lock);
+	spin_lock(&ip->i_cluster->icl_lock);
+	ip->i_cluster->icl_buf = bp;
 
 	clcount = 0;
-	for (iq = ip->i_cnext; iq != ip; iq = iq->i_cnext) {
+	hlist_for_each_entry(iq, entry, &ip->i_cluster->icl_inodes, i_cnode) {
+		if (iq == ip)
+			continue;
+
 		/*
 		 * Do an un-protected check to see if the inode is dirty and
 		 * is a candidate for flushing.  These checks will be repeated
@@ -3227,7 +3223,7 @@ xfs_iflush(
 			xfs_iunlock(iq, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
 		}
 	}
-	mutex_spinunlock(&ch->ch_lock, s);
+	spin_unlock(&ip->i_cluster->icl_lock);
 
 	if (clcount) {
 		XFS_STATS_INC(xs_icluster_flushcnt);
@@ -3264,7 +3260,7 @@ cluster_corrupt_out:
 	/* Corruption detected in the clustering loop.  Invalidate the
 	 * inode buffer and shut down the filesystem.
 	 */
-	mutex_spinunlock(&ch->ch_lock, s);
+	spin_unlock(&ip->i_cluster->icl_lock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Clean up the buffer.  If it was B_DELWRI, just release it --