clarify a usage constraint for cnt32_to_63()

The cnt32_to_63 algorithm relies on proper counter data evaluation
ordering to work properly. This was missing from the provided
documentation.

Let's augment the documentation with the missing usage constraint and
fix the only instance that got it wrong.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/cnt32_to_63.h b/include/linux/cnt32_to_63.h
index 7605fdd1eb6..e3d8bf26e5e 100644
--- a/include/linux/cnt32_to_63.h
+++ b/include/linux/cnt32_to_63.h
@@ -61,13 +61,31 @@ union cnt32_to_63 {
  *
  * 2) this code must not be preempted for a duration longer than the
  *    32-bit counter half period minus the longest period between two
- *    calls to this code.
+ *    calls to this code;
  *
  * Those requirements ensure proper update to the state bit in memory.
  * This is usually not a problem in practice, but if it is then a kernel
  * timer should be scheduled to manage for this code to be executed often
  * enough.
  *
+ * And finally:
+ *
+ * 3) the cnt_lo argument must be seen as a globally incrementing value,
+ *    meaning that it should be a direct reference to the counter data which
+ *    can be evaluated according to a specific ordering within the macro,
+ *    and not the result of a previous evaluation stored in a variable.
+ *
+ * For example, this is wrong:
+ *
+ *	u32 partial = get_hw_count();
+ *	u64 full = cnt32_to_63(partial);
+ *	return full;
+ *
+ * This is fine:
+ *
+ *	u64 full = cnt32_to_63(get_hw_count());
+ *	return full;
+ *
  * Note that the top bit (bit 63) in the returned value should be considered
  * as garbage.  It is not cleared here because callers are likely to use a
  * multiplier on the returned value which can get rid of the top bit