summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/events
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>2011-11-07 15:54:12 +0300
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2011-11-14 13:31:28 +0100
commit5d81e5cfb37a174e8ddc0413e2e70cdf05807ace (patch)
tree3190ed611a1b88092d4a0aee584b505999a26f17 /kernel/events
parent9251f904f95175b4a1d8cbc0449e748f9edd7629 (diff)
events: Don't divide events if it has field period
This patch solves the following problem: Now some samples may be lost due to throttling. The number of samples is restricted by sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate/HZ. A trace event is divided on some samples according to event's period. I don't sure, that we should generate more than one sample on each trace event. I think the better way to use SAMPLE_PERIOD. E.g.: I want to trace when a process sleeps. I created a process, which sleeps for 1ms and for 4ms. perf got 100 events in both cases. swapper 0 [000] 1141.371830: sched_stat_sleep: comm=foo pid=1801 delay=1386750 [ns] swapper 0 [000] 1141.369444: sched_stat_sleep: comm=foo pid=1801 delay=4499585 [ns] In the first case a kernel want to send 4499585 events and in the second case it wants to send 1386750 events. perf-reports shows that process sleeps in both places equal time. It's bug. With this patch kernel generates one event on each "sleep" and the time slice is saved in the field "period". Perf knows how handle it. Signed-off-by: Andrew Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1320670457-2633428-3-git-send-email-avagin@openvz.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/events')
-rw-r--r--kernel/events/core.c7
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index eadac69265f..8d9dea56c26 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -4528,7 +4528,6 @@ static void perf_swevent_overflow(struct perf_event *event, u64 overflow,
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
int throttle = 0;
- data->period = event->hw.last_period;
if (!overflow)
overflow = perf_swevent_set_period(event);
@@ -4562,6 +4561,12 @@ static void perf_swevent_event(struct perf_event *event, u64 nr,
if (!is_sampling_event(event))
return;
+ if ((event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD) && !event->attr.freq) {
+ data->period = nr;
+ return perf_swevent_overflow(event, 1, data, regs);
+ } else
+ data->period = event->hw.last_period;
+
if (nr == 1 && hwc->sample_period == 1 && !event->attr.freq)
return perf_swevent_overflow(event, 1, data, regs);