diff options
author | Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> | 2008-12-05 18:58:31 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2008-12-08 14:31:51 +0100 |
commit | 0b8f1efad30bd58f89961b82dfe68b9edf8fd2ac (patch) | |
tree | 239251bad791fd60af8c0f2ba365b7188395c83f /kernel/irq/autoprobe.c | |
parent | 218d11a8b071b23b76c484fd5f72a4fe3306801e (diff) |
sparse irq_desc[] array: core kernel and x86 changes
Impact: new feature
Problem on distro kernels: irq_desc[NR_IRQS] takes megabytes of RAM with
NR_CPUS set to large values. The goal is to be able to scale up to much
larger NR_IRQS value without impacting the (important) common case.
To solve this, we generalize irq_desc[NR_IRQS] to an (optional) array of
irq_desc pointers.
When CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ=y is used, we use kzalloc_node to get irq_desc,
this also makes the IRQ descriptors NUMA-local (to the site that calls
request_irq()).
This gets rid of the irq_cfg[] static array on x86 as well: irq_cfg now
uses desc->chip_data for x86 to store irq_cfg.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/irq/autoprobe.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/irq/autoprobe.c | 15 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/irq/autoprobe.c b/kernel/irq/autoprobe.c index cc0f7321b8c..650ce4102a6 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/autoprobe.c +++ b/kernel/irq/autoprobe.c @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ unsigned long probe_irq_on(void) * flush such a longstanding irq before considering it as spurious. */ for_each_irq_desc_reverse(i, desc) { + if (!desc) + continue; + spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock); if (!desc->action && !(desc->status & IRQ_NOPROBE)) { /* @@ -68,6 +71,9 @@ unsigned long probe_irq_on(void) * happened in the previous stage, it may have masked itself) */ for_each_irq_desc_reverse(i, desc) { + if (!desc) + continue; + spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock); if (!desc->action && !(desc->status & IRQ_NOPROBE)) { desc->status |= IRQ_AUTODETECT | IRQ_WAITING; @@ -86,6 +92,9 @@ unsigned long probe_irq_on(void) * Now filter out any obviously spurious interrupts */ for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) { + if (!desc) + continue; + spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock); status = desc->status; @@ -124,6 +133,9 @@ unsigned int probe_irq_mask(unsigned long val) int i; for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) { + if (!desc) + continue; + spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock); status = desc->status; @@ -166,6 +178,9 @@ int probe_irq_off(unsigned long val) unsigned int status; for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) { + if (!desc) + continue; + spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock); status = desc->status; |