diff options
author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2011-11-28 09:46:22 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2011-11-28 09:46:22 -0800 |
commit | d4bbf7e7759afc172e2bfbc5c416324590049cdd (patch) | |
tree | 7eab5ee5481cd3dcf1162329fec827177640018a /kernel/rtmutex.c | |
parent | a150439c4a97db379f0ed6faa46fbbb6e7bf3cb2 (diff) | |
parent | 401d0069cb344f401bc9d264c31db55876ff78c0 (diff) |
Merge branch 'master' into x86/memblock
Conflicts & resolutions:
* arch/x86/xen/setup.c
dc91c728fd "xen: allow extra memory to be in multiple regions"
24aa07882b "memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free..."
conflicted on xen_add_extra_mem() updates. The resolution is
trivial as the latter just want to replace
memblock_x86_reserve_range() with memblock_reserve().
* drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
166e9278a3f "x86/ia64: intel-iommu: move to drivers/iommu/"
5dfe8660a3d "bootmem: Replace work_with_active_regions() with..."
conflicted as the former moved the file under drivers/iommu/.
Resolved by applying the chnages from the latter on the moved
file.
* mm/Kconfig
6661672053a "memblock: add NO_BOOTMEM config symbol"
c378ddd53f9 "memblock, x86: Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option"
conflicted trivially. Both added config options. Just
letting both add their own options resolves the conflict.
* mm/memblock.c
d1f0ece6cdc "mm/memblock.c: small function definition fixes"
ed7b56a799c "memblock: Remove memblock_memory_can_coalesce()"
confliected. The former updates function removed by the
latter. Resolution is trivial.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rtmutex.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/rtmutex.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex.c b/kernel/rtmutex.c index ab449117aaf..f9d8482dd48 100644 --- a/kernel/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ * See Documentation/rt-mutex-design.txt for details. */ #include <linux/spinlock.h> -#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/export.h> #include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/timer.h> @@ -579,6 +579,7 @@ __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) { int ret = 0; + int was_disabled; for (;;) { /* Try to acquire the lock: */ @@ -601,10 +602,17 @@ __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + was_disabled = irqs_disabled(); + if (was_disabled) + local_irq_enable(); + debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter); schedule_rt_mutex(lock); + if (was_disabled) + local_irq_disable(); + raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); set_current_state(state); } @@ -890,7 +898,7 @@ void __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name) { lock->owner = NULL; raw_spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock); - plist_head_init_raw(&lock->wait_list, &lock->wait_lock); + plist_head_init(&lock->wait_list); debug_rt_mutex_init(lock, name); } |