diff options
author | Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> | 2011-10-03 15:09:00 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2011-10-06 12:46:23 +0200 |
commit | ca38062e57e97791c2f62e3dbd06caf3ebb5721c (patch) | |
tree | c022f6a3d3087cc8eaebbc5640ca145f7d9c50d8 /kernel | |
parent | 9243a169acb9df9c63632fb7d5464359a107877a (diff) |
sched: Use resched IPI to kick off the nohz idle balance
Current use of smp call function to kick the nohz idle balance can deadlock
in this scenario.
1. cpu-A did a generic_exec_single() to cpu-B and after queuing its call single
data (csd) to the call single queue, cpu-A took a timer interrupt. Actual IPI
to cpu-B to process the call single queue is not yet sent.
2. As part of the timer interrupt handler, cpu-A decided to kick cpu-B
for the idle load balancing (sets cpu-B's rq->nohz_balance_kick to 1)
and __smp_call_function_single() with nowait will queue the csd to the
cpu-B's queue. But the generic_exec_single() won't send an IPI to cpu-B
as the call single queue was not empty.
3. cpu-A is busy with lot of interrupts
4. Meanwhile cpu-B is entering and exiting idle and noticed that it has
it's rq->nohz_balance_kick set to '1'. So it will go ahead and do the
idle load balancer and clear its rq->nohz_balance_kick.
5. At this point, csd queued as part of the step-2 above is still locked
and waiting to be serviced on cpu-B.
6. cpu-A is still busy with interrupt load and now it got another timer
interrupt and as part of it decided to kick cpu-B for another idle load
balancing (as it finds cpu-B's rq->nohz_balance_kick cleared in step-4
above) and does __smp_call_function_single() with the same csd that is
still locked.
7. And we get a deadlock waiting for the csd_lock() in the
__smp_call_function_single().
Main issue here is that cpu-B can service the idle load balancer kick
request from cpu-A even with out receiving the IPI and this lead to
doing multiple __smp_call_function_single() on the same csd leading to
deadlock.
To kick a cpu, scheduler already has the reschedule vector reserved. Use
that mechanism (kick_process()) instead of using the generic smp call function
mechanism to kick off the nohz idle load balancing and avoid the deadlock.
[ This issue is present from 2.6.35+ kernels, but marking it -stable
only from v3.0+ as the proposed fix depends on the scheduler_ipi()
that is introduced recently. ]
Reported-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # v3.0+
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111003220934.834943260@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched.c | 21 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched_fair.c | 29 |
2 files changed, 28 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index 4cdc91cf48f..9e49af00ae3 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -1404,6 +1404,18 @@ void wake_up_idle_cpu(int cpu) smp_send_reschedule(cpu); } +static inline bool got_nohz_idle_kick(void) +{ + return idle_cpu(smp_processor_id()) && this_rq()->nohz_balance_kick; +} + +#else /* CONFIG_NO_HZ */ + +static inline bool got_nohz_idle_kick(void) +{ + return false; +} + #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ */ static u64 sched_avg_period(void) @@ -2717,7 +2729,7 @@ static void sched_ttwu_pending(void) void scheduler_ipi(void) { - if (llist_empty(&this_rq()->wake_list)) + if (llist_empty(&this_rq()->wake_list) && !got_nohz_idle_kick()) return; /* @@ -2735,6 +2747,12 @@ void scheduler_ipi(void) */ irq_enter(); sched_ttwu_pending(); + + /* + * Check if someone kicked us for doing the nohz idle load balance. + */ + if (unlikely(got_nohz_idle_kick() && !need_resched())) + raise_softirq_irqoff(SCHED_SOFTIRQ); irq_exit(); } @@ -8288,7 +8306,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void) rq_attach_root(rq, &def_root_domain); #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ rq->nohz_balance_kick = 0; - init_sched_softirq_csd(&per_cpu(remote_sched_softirq_cb, i)); #endif #endif init_rq_hrtick(rq); diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c index fef0bfde7c8..6c5fa109922 100644 --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c @@ -4269,22 +4269,6 @@ out_unlock: } #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ - -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct call_single_data, remote_sched_softirq_cb); - -static void trigger_sched_softirq(void *data) -{ - raise_softirq_irqoff(SCHED_SOFTIRQ); -} - -static inline void init_sched_softirq_csd(struct call_single_data *csd) -{ - csd->func = trigger_sched_softirq; - csd->info = NULL; - csd->flags = 0; - csd->priv = 0; -} - /* * idle load balancing details * - One of the idle CPUs nominates itself as idle load_balancer, while @@ -4450,11 +4434,16 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(int cpu) } if (!cpu_rq(ilb_cpu)->nohz_balance_kick) { - struct call_single_data *cp; - cpu_rq(ilb_cpu)->nohz_balance_kick = 1; - cp = &per_cpu(remote_sched_softirq_cb, cpu); - __smp_call_function_single(ilb_cpu, cp, 0); + + smp_mb(); + /* + * Use smp_send_reschedule() instead of resched_cpu(). + * This way we generate a sched IPI on the target cpu which + * is idle. And the softirq performing nohz idle load balance + * will be run before returning from the IPI. + */ + smp_send_reschedule(ilb_cpu); } return; } |