diff options
| author | Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> | 2013-05-01 00:07:00 +0900 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2013-05-14 11:48:15 -0700 |
| commit | 8f174b1175a10903ade40f36eb6c896412877ca0 (patch) | |
| tree | b6f1c9c7317ecc1092f582aca0160fdfb77c624e /kernel | |
| parent | d3251859168b0b12841e1b90d6d768ab478dc23d (diff) | |
workqueue: correct handling of the pool spin_lock
When we fail to mutex_trylock(), we release the pool spin_lock and do
mutex_lock(). After that, we should regrab the pool spin_lock, but,
regrabbing is missed in current code. So correct it.
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 1ae602809ef..286847b9022 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -2059,6 +2059,7 @@ static bool manage_workers(struct worker *worker) if (unlikely(!mutex_trylock(&pool->manager_mutex))) { spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex); + spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); ret = true; } |