diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-03-31 10:59:39 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-03-31 10:59:39 -0700 |
commit | 462bf234a82ae1ae9d7628f59bc81022591e1348 (patch) | |
tree | f75eea7864ae7c72c0757d5d090e38f757b5cb2d /kernel | |
parent | 455c6fdbd219161bd09b1165f11699d6d73de11c (diff) | |
parent | 6f008e72cd111a119b5d8de8c5438d892aae99eb (diff) |
Merge branch 'core-locking-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull core locking updates from Ingo Molnar:
"The biggest change is the MCS spinlock generalization changes from Tim
Chen, Peter Zijlstra, Jason Low et al. There's also lockdep
fixes/enhancements from Oleg Nesterov, in particular a false negative
fix related to lockdep_set_novalidate_class() usage"
* 'core-locking-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (22 commits)
locking/mutex: Fix debug checks
locking/mutexes: Add extra reschedule point
locking/mutexes: Introduce cancelable MCS lock for adaptive spinning
locking/mutexes: Unlock the mutex without the wait_lock
locking/mutexes: Modify the way optimistic spinners are queued
locking/mutexes: Return false if task need_resched() in mutex_can_spin_on_owner()
locking: Move mcs_spinlock.h into kernel/locking/
m68k: Skip futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() test
futex: Allow architectures to skip futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() test
Revert "sched/wait: Suppress Sparse 'variable shadowing' warning"
lockdep: Change lockdep_set_novalidate_class() to use _and_name
lockdep: Change mark_held_locks() to check hlock->check instead of lockdep_no_validate
lockdep: Don't create the wrong dependency on hlock->check == 0
lockdep: Make held_lock->check and "int check" argument bool
locking/mcs: Allow architecture specific asm files to be used for contended case
locking/mcs: Order the header files in Kbuild of each architecture in alphabetical order
sched/wait: Suppress Sparse 'variable shadowing' warning
hung_task/Documentation: Fix hung_task_warnings description
locking/mcs: Allow architectures to hook in to contended paths
locking/mcs: Micro-optimize the MCS code, add extra comments
...
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/futex.c | 37 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/Makefile | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 17 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c | 178 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h | 129 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/mutex.c | 94 |
7 files changed, 377 insertions, 86 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index 08ec814ad9d..67dacaf93e5 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -157,7 +157,9 @@ * enqueue. */ +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_FUTEX_CMPXCHG int __read_mostly futex_cmpxchg_enabled; +#endif /* * Futex flags used to encode options to functions and preserve them across @@ -2875,9 +2877,28 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(futex, u32 __user *, uaddr, int, op, u32, val, return do_futex(uaddr, op, val, tp, uaddr2, val2, val3); } -static int __init futex_init(void) +static void __init futex_detect_cmpxchg(void) { +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_FUTEX_CMPXCHG u32 curval; + + /* + * This will fail and we want it. Some arch implementations do + * runtime detection of the futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() + * functionality. We want to know that before we call in any + * of the complex code paths. Also we want to prevent + * registration of robust lists in that case. NULL is + * guaranteed to fault and we get -EFAULT on functional + * implementation, the non-functional ones will return + * -ENOSYS. + */ + if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, NULL, 0, 0) == -EFAULT) + futex_cmpxchg_enabled = 1; +#endif +} + +static int __init futex_init(void) +{ unsigned int futex_shift; unsigned long i; @@ -2893,18 +2914,8 @@ static int __init futex_init(void) &futex_shift, NULL, futex_hashsize, futex_hashsize); futex_hashsize = 1UL << futex_shift; - /* - * This will fail and we want it. Some arch implementations do - * runtime detection of the futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() - * functionality. We want to know that before we call in any - * of the complex code paths. Also we want to prevent - * registration of robust lists in that case. NULL is - * guaranteed to fault and we get -EFAULT on functional - * implementation, the non-functional ones will return - * -ENOSYS. - */ - if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, NULL, 0, 0) == -EFAULT) - futex_cmpxchg_enabled = 1; + + futex_detect_cmpxchg(); for (i = 0; i < futex_hashsize; i++) { atomic_set(&futex_queues[i].waiters, 0); diff --git a/kernel/locking/Makefile b/kernel/locking/Makefile index baab8e5e7f6..2a9ee96ecf0 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/Makefile +++ b/kernel/locking/Makefile @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -obj-y += mutex.o semaphore.o rwsem.o lglock.o +obj-y += mutex.o semaphore.o rwsem.o lglock.o mcs_spinlock.o ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER CFLAGS_REMOVE_lockdep.o = -pg diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index eb8a54783fa..bf0c6b0dd9c 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -1936,12 +1936,12 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next) for (;;) { int distance = curr->lockdep_depth - depth + 1; - hlock = curr->held_locks + depth-1; + hlock = curr->held_locks + depth - 1; /* * Only non-recursive-read entries get new dependencies * added: */ - if (hlock->read != 2) { + if (hlock->read != 2 && hlock->check) { if (!check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next, distance, trylock_loop)) return 0; @@ -2098,7 +2098,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock, * (If lookup_chain_cache() returns with 1 it acquires * graph_lock for us) */ - if (!hlock->trylock && (hlock->check == 2) && + if (!hlock->trylock && hlock->check && lookup_chain_cache(curr, hlock, chain_key)) { /* * Check whether last held lock: @@ -2517,7 +2517,7 @@ mark_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr, enum mark_type mark) BUG_ON(usage_bit >= LOCK_USAGE_STATES); - if (hlock_class(hlock)->key == __lockdep_no_validate__.subkeys) + if (!hlock->check) continue; if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, usage_bit)) @@ -3055,9 +3055,6 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int class_idx; u64 chain_key; - if (!prove_locking) - check = 1; - if (unlikely(!debug_locks)) return 0; @@ -3069,8 +3066,8 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled())) return 0; - if (lock->key == &__lockdep_no_validate__) - check = 1; + if (!prove_locking || lock->key == &__lockdep_no_validate__) + check = 0; if (subclass < NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES) class = lock->class_cache[subclass]; @@ -3138,7 +3135,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, hlock->holdtime_stamp = lockstat_clock(); #endif - if (check == 2 && !mark_irqflags(curr, hlock)) + if (check && !mark_irqflags(curr, hlock)) return 0; /* mark it as used: */ diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..838dc9e0066 --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c @@ -0,0 +1,178 @@ + +#include <linux/percpu.h> +#include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> +#include "mcs_spinlock.h" + +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP + +/* + * An MCS like lock especially tailored for optimistic spinning for sleeping + * lock implementations (mutex, rwsem, etc). + * + * Using a single mcs node per CPU is safe because sleeping locks should not be + * called from interrupt context and we have preemption disabled while + * spinning. + */ +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct optimistic_spin_queue, osq_node); + +/* + * Get a stable @node->next pointer, either for unlock() or unqueue() purposes. + * Can return NULL in case we were the last queued and we updated @lock instead. + */ +static inline struct optimistic_spin_queue * +osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock, + struct optimistic_spin_queue *node, + struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev) +{ + struct optimistic_spin_queue *next = NULL; + + for (;;) { + if (*lock == node && cmpxchg(lock, node, prev) == node) { + /* + * We were the last queued, we moved @lock back. @prev + * will now observe @lock and will complete its + * unlock()/unqueue(). + */ + break; + } + + /* + * We must xchg() the @node->next value, because if we were to + * leave it in, a concurrent unlock()/unqueue() from + * @node->next might complete Step-A and think its @prev is + * still valid. + * + * If the concurrent unlock()/unqueue() wins the race, we'll + * wait for either @lock to point to us, through its Step-B, or + * wait for a new @node->next from its Step-C. + */ + if (node->next) { + next = xchg(&node->next, NULL); + if (next) + break; + } + + arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); + } + + return next; +} + +bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock) +{ + struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node); + struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev, *next; + + node->locked = 0; + node->next = NULL; + + node->prev = prev = xchg(lock, node); + if (likely(prev == NULL)) + return true; + + ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node; + + /* + * Normally @prev is untouchable after the above store; because at that + * moment unlock can proceed and wipe the node element from stack. + * + * However, since our nodes are static per-cpu storage, we're + * guaranteed their existence -- this allows us to apply + * cmpxchg in an attempt to undo our queueing. + */ + + while (!smp_load_acquire(&node->locked)) { + /* + * If we need to reschedule bail... so we can block. + */ + if (need_resched()) + goto unqueue; + + arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); + } + return true; + +unqueue: + /* + * Step - A -- stabilize @prev + * + * Undo our @prev->next assignment; this will make @prev's + * unlock()/unqueue() wait for a next pointer since @lock points to us + * (or later). + */ + + for (;;) { + if (prev->next == node && + cmpxchg(&prev->next, node, NULL) == node) + break; + + /* + * We can only fail the cmpxchg() racing against an unlock(), + * in which case we should observe @node->locked becomming + * true. + */ + if (smp_load_acquire(&node->locked)) + return true; + + arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); + + /* + * Or we race against a concurrent unqueue()'s step-B, in which + * case its step-C will write us a new @node->prev pointer. + */ + prev = ACCESS_ONCE(node->prev); + } + + /* + * Step - B -- stabilize @next + * + * Similar to unlock(), wait for @node->next or move @lock from @node + * back to @prev. + */ + + next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, prev); + if (!next) + return false; + + /* + * Step - C -- unlink + * + * @prev is stable because its still waiting for a new @prev->next + * pointer, @next is stable because our @node->next pointer is NULL and + * it will wait in Step-A. + */ + + ACCESS_ONCE(next->prev) = prev; + ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = next; + + return false; +} + +void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock) +{ + struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node); + struct optimistic_spin_queue *next; + + /* + * Fast path for the uncontended case. + */ + if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node)) + return; + + /* + * Second most likely case. + */ + next = xchg(&node->next, NULL); + if (next) { + ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1; + return; + } + + next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, NULL); + if (next) + ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1; +} + +#endif + diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a2dbac4aca6 --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ +/* + * MCS lock defines + * + * This file contains the main data structure and API definitions of MCS lock. + * + * The MCS lock (proposed by Mellor-Crummey and Scott) is a simple spin-lock + * with the desirable properties of being fair, and with each cpu trying + * to acquire the lock spinning on a local variable. + * It avoids expensive cache bouncings that common test-and-set spin-lock + * implementations incur. + */ +#ifndef __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H +#define __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H + +#include <asm/mcs_spinlock.h> + +struct mcs_spinlock { + struct mcs_spinlock *next; + int locked; /* 1 if lock acquired */ +}; + +#ifndef arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended +/* + * Using smp_load_acquire() provides a memory barrier that ensures + * subsequent operations happen after the lock is acquired. + */ +#define arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(l) \ +do { \ + while (!(smp_load_acquire(l))) \ + arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); \ +} while (0) +#endif + +#ifndef arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended +/* + * smp_store_release() provides a memory barrier to ensure all + * operations in the critical section has been completed before + * unlocking. + */ +#define arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(l) \ + smp_store_release((l), 1) +#endif + +/* + * Note: the smp_load_acquire/smp_store_release pair is not + * sufficient to form a full memory barrier across + * cpus for many architectures (except x86) for mcs_unlock and mcs_lock. + * For applications that need a full barrier across multiple cpus + * with mcs_unlock and mcs_lock pair, smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() should be + * used after mcs_lock. + */ + +/* + * In order to acquire the lock, the caller should declare a local node and + * pass a reference of the node to this function in addition to the lock. + * If the lock has already been acquired, then this will proceed to spin + * on this node->locked until the previous lock holder sets the node->locked + * in mcs_spin_unlock(). + * + * We don't inline mcs_spin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the + * time spent in this lock function. + */ +static inline +void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node) +{ + struct mcs_spinlock *prev; + + /* Init node */ + node->locked = 0; + node->next = NULL; + + prev = xchg(lock, node); + if (likely(prev == NULL)) { + /* + * Lock acquired, don't need to set node->locked to 1. Threads + * only spin on its own node->locked value for lock acquisition. + * However, since this thread can immediately acquire the lock + * and does not proceed to spin on its own node->locked, this + * value won't be used. If a debug mode is needed to + * audit lock status, then set node->locked value here. + */ + return; + } + ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node; + + /* Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down. */ + arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(&node->locked); +} + +/* + * Releases the lock. The caller should pass in the corresponding node that + * was used to acquire the lock. + */ +static inline +void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node) +{ + struct mcs_spinlock *next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next); + + if (likely(!next)) { + /* + * Release the lock by setting it to NULL + */ + if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node)) + return; + /* Wait until the next pointer is set */ + while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next))) + arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); + } + + /* Pass lock to next waiter. */ + arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(&next->locked); +} + +/* + * Cancellable version of the MCS lock above. + * + * Intended for adaptive spinning of sleeping locks: + * mutex_lock()/rwsem_down_{read,write}() etc. + */ + +struct optimistic_spin_queue { + struct optimistic_spin_queue *next, *prev; + int locked; /* 1 if lock acquired */ +}; + +extern bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock); +extern void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock); + +#endif /* __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H */ diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c index faf6f5b53e7..e1191c996c5 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c @@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ void debug_mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock) DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lock->wait_list.prev && !lock->wait_list.next); mutex_clear_owner(lock); + + /* + * __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() is explicitly 0 for debug + * mutexes so that we can do it here after we've verified state. + */ + atomic_set(&lock->count, 1); } void debug_mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name, diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c index 4dd6e4c219d..14fe72cc8ce 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/debug_locks.h> +#include "mcs_spinlock.h" /* * In the DEBUG case we are using the "NULL fastpath" for mutexes, @@ -33,6 +34,13 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES # include "mutex-debug.h" # include <asm-generic/mutex-null.h> +/* + * Must be 0 for the debug case so we do not do the unlock outside of the + * wait_lock region. debug_mutex_unlock() will do the actual unlock in this + * case. + */ +# undef __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock +# define __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() 0 #else # include "mutex.h" # include <asm/mutex.h> @@ -52,7 +60,7 @@ __mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name, struct lock_class_key *key) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lock->wait_list); mutex_clear_owner(lock); #ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER - lock->spin_mlock = NULL; + lock->osq = NULL; #endif debug_mutex_init(lock, name, key); @@ -111,54 +119,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_lock); * more or less simultaneously, the spinners need to acquire a MCS lock * first before spinning on the owner field. * - * We don't inline mspin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the - * time spent in this lock function. */ -struct mspin_node { - struct mspin_node *next ; - int locked; /* 1 if lock acquired */ -}; -#define MLOCK(mutex) ((struct mspin_node **)&((mutex)->spin_mlock)) - -static noinline -void mspin_lock(struct mspin_node **lock, struct mspin_node *node) -{ - struct mspin_node *prev; - - /* Init node */ - node->locked = 0; - node->next = NULL; - - prev = xchg(lock, node); - if (likely(prev == NULL)) { - /* Lock acquired */ - node->locked = 1; - return; - } - ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node; - smp_wmb(); - /* Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down */ - while (!ACCESS_ONCE(node->locked)) - arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); -} - -static void mspin_unlock(struct mspin_node **lock, struct mspin_node *node) -{ - struct mspin_node *next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next); - - if (likely(!next)) { - /* - * Release the lock by setting it to NULL - */ - if (cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node) - return; - /* Wait until the next pointer is set */ - while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next))) - arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); - } - ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1; - smp_wmb(); -} /* * Mutex spinning code migrated from kernel/sched/core.c @@ -212,6 +173,9 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock) struct task_struct *owner; int retval = 1; + if (need_resched()) + return 0; + rcu_read_lock(); owner = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->owner); if (owner) @@ -446,9 +410,11 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, if (!mutex_can_spin_on_owner(lock)) goto slowpath; + if (!osq_lock(&lock->osq)) + goto slowpath; + for (;;) { struct task_struct *owner; - struct mspin_node node; if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) { struct ww_mutex *ww; @@ -463,19 +429,16 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, * performed the optimistic spinning cannot be done. */ if (ACCESS_ONCE(ww->ctx)) - goto slowpath; + break; } /* * If there's an owner, wait for it to either * release the lock or go to sleep. */ - mspin_lock(MLOCK(lock), &node); owner = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->owner); - if (owner && !mutex_spin_on_owner(lock, owner)) { - mspin_unlock(MLOCK(lock), &node); - goto slowpath; - } + if (owner && !mutex_spin_on_owner(lock, owner)) + break; if ((atomic_read(&lock->count) == 1) && (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->count, 1, 0) == 1)) { @@ -488,11 +451,10 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, } mutex_set_owner(lock); - mspin_unlock(MLOCK(lock), &node); + osq_unlock(&lock->osq); preempt_enable(); return 0; } - mspin_unlock(MLOCK(lock), &node); /* * When there's no owner, we might have preempted between the @@ -501,7 +463,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, * the owner complete. */ if (!owner && (need_resched() || rt_task(task))) - goto slowpath; + break; /* * The cpu_relax() call is a compiler barrier which forces @@ -511,7 +473,15 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, */ arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); } + osq_unlock(&lock->osq); slowpath: + /* + * If we fell out of the spin path because of need_resched(), + * reschedule now, before we try-lock the mutex. This avoids getting + * scheduled out right after we obtained the mutex. + */ + if (need_resched()) + schedule_preempt_disabled(); #endif spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags); @@ -717,10 +687,6 @@ __mutex_unlock_common_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_count, int nested) struct mutex *lock = container_of(lock_count, struct mutex, count); unsigned long flags; - spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, nested, _RET_IP_); - debug_mutex_unlock(lock); - /* * some architectures leave the lock unlocked in the fastpath failure * case, others need to leave it locked. In the later case we have to @@ -729,6 +695,10 @@ __mutex_unlock_common_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_count, int nested) if (__mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock()) atomic_set(&lock->count, 1); + spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags); + mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, nested, _RET_IP_); + debug_mutex_unlock(lock); + if (!list_empty(&lock->wait_list)) { /* get the first entry from the wait-list: */ struct mutex_waiter *waiter = |