diff options
author | Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> | 2014-01-07 17:25:19 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> | 2014-01-28 13:20:21 -0800 |
commit | 18f687d538449373c37cbe52b03f5f3d42b7c7ed (patch) | |
tree | da340e3522b0e22516af99a7f3cb44d96cfdd6cf /lib/iovec.c | |
parent | 896c14f97f700aec6565154f2451605d7c5ce3ed (diff) |
Btrfs: fix protection between send and root deletion
We should gurantee that parent and clone roots can not be destroyed
during send, for this we have two ideas.
1.by holding @subvol_sem, this might be a nightmare, because it will
block all subvolumes deletion for a long time.
2.Miao pointed out we can reuse @send_in_progress, that mean we will
skip snapshot deletion if root sending is in progress.
Here we adopt the second approach since it won't block other subvolumes
deletion for a long time.
Besides in btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot(), we only check first root
, if this root is involved in send, we return directly rather than
continue to check.There are several reasons about it:
1.this case happen seldomly.
2.after sending,cleaner thread can continue to drop that root.
3.make code simple
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/iovec.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions